Durango 2005 4.7L: Ethanol?
Actually it will be the 2007 4.7L that will be flex fuel. Yes it would be possible to fit a 2005 model, but it would be costly. The big difference is the fuel system. The engines that have flex fuel capabilities have stainless steel fuel lines. Ethonel is a corrosive substance and will eat dry out the seals on a regular gasoline based engine.
http://www.e85fuel.com/information/daimler_chrysler.php
The 06' and 07' 4.7L Durangos are flex fuel.
According to some sources most modern vehicles can run on a 10% ethanol (e10) blend without any problems.
Unless you are making the fuel yourself the cost versus fuel efficiency will be the same as fossil fuels (ethanol tends to decrease mpg).
The 06' and 07' 4.7L Durangos are flex fuel.
According to some sources most modern vehicles can run on a 10% ethanol (e10) blend without any problems.
Unless you are making the fuel yourself the cost versus fuel efficiency will be the same as fossil fuels (ethanol tends to decrease mpg).
Yes, even Consumer's Reports has a cover page on Ethanol last month. You'd think they'd be pro-anything-green, but the title is "The Ethanol Myth". You get about 27% poorer fuel efficiency, giving a lot fewer miles to the tank, greater cost to the consumer than simply running gasoline. Not to mention overall greater consumption of the gasoline portion in the process!
Probably greater overall pollution due to the more frequent fillups -- and it's when you fill up your tank that you're really polluting the air most of all due to direct introduction of a large quantity of fumes.
I just don't get it -- there are way too many negatives.
Probably greater overall pollution due to the more frequent fillups -- and it's when you fill up your tank that you're really polluting the air most of all due to direct introduction of a large quantity of fumes.
I just don't get it -- there are way too many negatives.
Wow! This was a great explanation! If anyone else has more comments about the topic they will be really appreciatted. I like to learn more about it but from our point of view as consumers.
Thanks guys!
Thanks guys!
ORIGINAL: Intrepidacious
Yes, even Consumer's Reports has a cover page on Ethanol last month. You'd think they'd be pro-anything-green, but the title is "The Ethanol Myth". You get about 27% poorer fuel efficiency, giving a lot fewer miles to the tank, greater cost to the consumer than simply running gasoline. Not to mention overall greater consumption of the gasoline portion in the process!
Probably greater overall pollution due to the more frequent fillups -- and it's when you fill up your tank that you're really polluting the air most of all due to direct introduction of a large quantity of fumes.
I just don't get it -- there are way too many negatives.
Yes, even Consumer's Reports has a cover page on Ethanol last month. You'd think they'd be pro-anything-green, but the title is "The Ethanol Myth". You get about 27% poorer fuel efficiency, giving a lot fewer miles to the tank, greater cost to the consumer than simply running gasoline. Not to mention overall greater consumption of the gasoline portion in the process!
Probably greater overall pollution due to the more frequent fillups -- and it's when you fill up your tank that you're really polluting the air most of all due to direct introduction of a large quantity of fumes.
I just don't get it -- there are way too many negatives.
ORIGINAL: jasonwyo
Actually it will be the 2007 4.7L that will be flex fuel. Yes it would be possible to fit a 2005 model, but it would be costly. The big difference is the fuel system. The engines that have flex fuel capabilities have stainless steel fuel lines. Ethonel is a corrosive substance and will eat dry out the seals on a regular gasoline based engine.
Actually it will be the 2007 4.7L that will be flex fuel. Yes it would be possible to fit a 2005 model, but it would be costly. The big difference is the fuel system. The engines that have flex fuel capabilities have stainless steel fuel lines. Ethonel is a corrosive substance and will eat dry out the seals on a regular gasoline based engine.
Trending Topics
ORIGINAL: Intrepidacious
Yes, even Consumer's Reports has a cover page on Ethanol last month. You'd think they'd be pro-anything-green, but the title is "The Ethanol Myth". You get about 27% poorer fuel efficiency, giving a lot fewer miles to the tank, greater cost to the consumer than simply running gasoline. Not to mention overall greater consumption of the gasoline portion in the process!
Yes, even Consumer's Reports has a cover page on Ethanol last month. You'd think they'd be pro-anything-green, but the title is "The Ethanol Myth". You get about 27% poorer fuel efficiency, giving a lot fewer miles to the tank, greater cost to the consumer than simply running gasoline. Not to mention overall greater consumption of the gasoline portion in the process!
dw



