Decisions, what should I buy?
#71
03-31-2013, 07:41 PM
#73
03-31-2013, 09:32 PM
Grand Champion
#76
04-01-2013, 01:39 AM
Banned Goober Smoocher
#78
05-01-2013, 05:28 PM
Was looking at intakes on the interwebs, found this article about the Airgap
http://www.hughesengines.com/TechArt...edynotests.php
it seems that with a tune, there is no reason not to get a airgap. However, the graph with the tune just has HP on it, not torque. The article says the torque is better, but I wanna see a graph.
On a stock tune, the F1 is everywhere, the Kegger is obviously better all the way up to 3500. But thats too be expected the truck was desgined with the kegger in mind.
Thoughts?
This is from Hughes website im a little worried about bias because the F1 is hughes intake.
They just bash the M1s
I think they would work better with cams, heads, valves and the like
So is the F1 like, a better stock intake basically? This is all very interesting
http://www.hughesengines.com/TechArt...edynotests.php
it seems that with a tune, there is no reason not to get a airgap. However, the graph with the tune just has HP on it, not torque. The article says the torque is better, but I wanna see a graph.
On a stock tune, the F1 is everywhere, the Kegger is obviously better all the way up to 3500. But thats too be expected the truck was desgined with the kegger in mind.
Thoughts?
This is from Hughes website im a little worried about bias because the F1 is hughes intake.
They just bash the M1s
I think they would work better with cams, heads, valves and the like
So is the F1 like, a better stock intake basically? This is all very interesting
#79
05-02-2013, 07:24 PM
Veteran
If you do a little searching, there was a thread on the M1 vs. airgap topic not long ago...i'm also very torn on it but as of right now i'm leaning slightly towards the airgap because it does better at lower rpm. to me, it's basically a toss up...the m1 is easier to install from what i've heard tho