14.40s @ 94mph.
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: Unreal2k3
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
Professional
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 1
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: IndyRamMan
yea, they are just a BIT pricey. Ill be getting fiberglass fenders well before that. As a side note, anyone know where I can get a fiberglass hood thats factory style?
ORIGINAL: Unreal2k3
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
step 1: rear engage.
step 2: slicks engage.
step 3: traction devices engage.
Amateur
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
Good times on the truck. I gotta get to the track soon and get a baseline.As for the honda,heres the #'s and the 6speed wont make it that much faster.
Performance
0 - 60 Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Speed
(mph)
Braking 60 - 0
mph (ft.)
Honda Accord sedan EX - V6 3.0L (244 hp) 5A + ABS
7.80
15.88
93.70
No data
Honda Accord sedan - I4 2.4L (166 hp) 5A + ABS
7.91
16.22
90.80
No data
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: zddp8868
o great. here we go again. more fiberglass to burn up. tisk tisk tisk.
step 1: rear engage.
step 2: slicks engage.
step 3: traction devices engage.
ORIGINAL: IndyRamMan
yea, they are just a BIT pricey. Ill be getting fiberglass fenders well before that. As a side note, anyone know where I can get a fiberglass hood thats factory style?
ORIGINAL: Unreal2k3
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
Have you thought about getting a sheetmetal rear axle? That'd save ALOT of weight. ButI have no idea how much they cost...
step 1: rear engage.
step 2: slicks engage.
step 3: traction devices engage.
ORIGINAL: Oaktree
Good times on the truck. I gotta get to the track soon and get a baseline.As for the honda,heres the #'s and the 6speed wont make it that much faster.
Performance
0 - 60 Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Speed
(mph)
Braking 60 - 0
mph (ft.)
Honda Accord sedan EX - V6 3.0L (244 hp) 5A + ABS
7.80
15.88
93.70
No data
Honda Accord sedan - I4 2.4L (166 hp) 5A + ABS
7.91
16.22
90.80
No data
Good times on the truck. I gotta get to the track soon and get a baseline.As for the honda,heres the #'s and the 6speed wont make it that much faster.
Performance
0 - 60 Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Time
(seconds)
1/4 Mile Speed
(mph)
Braking 60 - 0
mph (ft.)
Honda Accord sedan EX - V6 3.0L (244 hp) 5A + ABS
7.80
15.88
93.70
No data
Honda Accord sedan - I4 2.4L (166 hp) 5A + ABS
7.91
16.22
90.80
No data
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: hometheaterman
The numbers I've seen have been high 14's stock and have seen timeslips from them with intakes and exhausts with low 14's.
The numbers I've seen have been high 14's stock and have seen timeslips from them with intakes and exhausts with low 14's.
Professional
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 1
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: hometheaterman
The numbers I've seen have been high 14's stock and have seen timeslips from them with intakes and exhausts with low 14's.
The numbers I've seen have been high 14's stock and have seen timeslips from them with intakes and exhausts with low 14's.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Honda-Accor...lip-12655.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/Honda-Accor...slip-9532.html
ive never paid attention enough to see one of them run in person, but there is three examples for ya. anywhere between mid 14s upgraded andand mid 15s stock. that said, talking about these cars is dumb. next.
Champion
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...on+id-267.html
There is one I assume an auto that ran 15.1 so it makes since the manual would be faster. I can't find the old info from a manual but I've read where people said Car and Driver said it did 14.5 in the quarter idk though.
I do agree with this arguing about this is stupid and I don't care enough to go run mine. If I go run something this probably wont be what I take.
There is one I assume an auto that ran 15.1 so it makes since the manual would be faster. I can't find the old info from a manual but I've read where people said Car and Driver said it did 14.5 in the quarter idk though.
I do agree with this arguing about this is stupid and I don't care enough to go run mine. If I go run something this probably wont be what I take.
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: mr freeze
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
fu cking funny!
