14.40s @ 94mph.
Professional
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 1
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: mr freeze
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: zddp8868
actually i think he'd beat it in the 1/4. the space shuttle takes forever from a dig.
ORIGINAL: mr freeze
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 419
Likes: 1
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: aim4squirrels
Ya, just make sure you aren't the truck behind it when it does it's burn outs. [sm=badbadbad.gif]
ORIGINAL: zddp8868
actually i think he'd beat it in the 1/4. the space shuttle takes forever from a dig.
ORIGINAL: mr freeze
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
All Star
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Belle Plaine, Minnesota
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
ORIGINAL: mr freeze
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
Hey Indy,the space shuttle is faster then your truck too and it weighs more also.Your truck is slow.[sm=gears.gif] But they both put off flames so we'll call it a tie.
[sm=boink3.gif]
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From:
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJKUCg_Bra8
hes cheating, hes got a rolling start!
heres another neet one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEZlpxb8Kp4 fastforeward twards the end.
hes cheating, hes got a rolling start!
heres another neet one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEZlpxb8Kp4 fastforeward twards the end.
Admin formally known as 94rt10ohio
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,025
Likes: 3
From: Curtice, OH
RE: 14.40s @ 94mph.
Good lord....
Here are the stats. Racing is 95% HP to weight ratio....
2006 Honda Accord V6
244 Base HP
3415lbs
That is 14 pounds per HP.
1996 Dodge Ram 5.9L
230HP Stock
4530lbs
That is 19.7 pounds per HP.
Using basic math, if you were to equal the HP to weight ratio the Ram would need 323HP (100HP over stock)to have a comparable run to your Accord. Then you also have to factor in age. Not knowing Indy's mods, he may be experiencing higher than stock drive train loss from an oldertranny,gears, ect.
Congrats, your 10 year newer lighter car can run with the modded Ram, to bad it can not look as good doing it.
Here are the stats. Racing is 95% HP to weight ratio....
2006 Honda Accord V6
244 Base HP
3415lbs
That is 14 pounds per HP.
1996 Dodge Ram 5.9L
230HP Stock
4530lbs
That is 19.7 pounds per HP.
Using basic math, if you were to equal the HP to weight ratio the Ram would need 323HP (100HP over stock)to have a comparable run to your Accord. Then you also have to factor in age. Not knowing Indy's mods, he may be experiencing higher than stock drive train loss from an oldertranny,gears, ect.
Congrats, your 10 year newer lighter car can run with the modded Ram, to bad it can not look as good doing it.