2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

My towing competition with a 350 chevy. no pics :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #11  
grizzlyfarmer2's Avatar
grizzlyfarmer2
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

they all fall apart
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 02:05 AM
  #12  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

It's not because I"m not looking. I grew up in Chevy country- the midwest farm belt. EVERYBODY owned chevy. I wanted a nice black Z71 with the "famous" 350. Couldn't find one anywhere so I checked out Dodge and found my girl. When I moved out west, I was counting trucks and for every 1 chevy there were 2 fords and for every ford there was 2 dodges. Out west there are way more Dodges and Fords than chevys and most are diesels. Like, I said, I hardly see any of the 94-98 style chevy trucks on the road anymore. Lots of tahoes though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #13  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by jason.w
The 350 was a good engine, just not as powerful as a Dodge's 360.
1993: 360-230hp 350-210hp

1996: 360-230hp 350-255hp

1998: 350-245hp 350-255hp

2001: 360-250hp 350-255hp

Chevy moved up to the vortec motors in 96. The vortec motors and the LT1 motors are tied in second for best domestic motor ever made. Of course the LS series motors are the best.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 09:39 AM
  #14  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

True, they had more HP on paper, but in real world contests, time and time again, the Dodge engine was more powerful. Just seemed to be able to outdo the supposedly more powerful Chevrolet engine, except in MPGs. Up until they got rid of the 350 pretty much in 1999. Did they have it in their commercial side or something until 2001?

Now the 5.3L and 6.0L engines are whole different story.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #15  
xskylinedx's Avatar
xskylinedx
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by Viper37
Maybe because you aren't looking for them?

The 350 small block is one of the most reliable engines ever put into a vehicle. I see GM truck's of all years around here all the time.

Thank you Mr. Argumentative for telling how we are wrong all the time. Does it ever get old starting s*** ? or constantly being negative? No wait, don't reply .... I already know the answer and I don't want to see what you have to say.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #16  
Viper37's Avatar
Viper37
Banned
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: The Communist Puppet State of Mexifornia
Default

Originally Posted by xskylinedx
Thank you Mr. Argumentative for telling how we are wrong all the time. Does it ever get old starting s*** ? or constantly being negative? No wait, don't reply .... I already know the answer and I don't want to see what you have to say.
What an insightful post.

The funny part is, I wasn't the only one who said that.

Originally Posted by Ramman18
It's not because I"m not looking. I grew up in Chevy country- the midwest farm belt. EVERYBODY owned chevy. I wanted a nice black Z71 with the "famous" 350. Couldn't find one anywhere so I checked out Dodge and found my girl. When I moved out west, I was counting trucks and for every 1 chevy there were 2 fords and for every ford there was 2 dodges. Out west there are way more Dodges and Fords than chevys and most are diesels. Like, I said, I hardly see any of the 94-98 style chevy trucks on the road anymore. Lots of tahoes though.
Not sure how far West you're talking, but out here in California, Dodges are rare. EVERYONE has Fords, and a handful of Chevy's.

I own like, 1 of 50 Dodge trucks in my town of 55k.
 

Last edited by Viper37; Oct 28, 2008 at 12:38 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #17  
xskylinedx's Avatar
xskylinedx
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by Viper37
What an insightful post.

The funny part is, I wasn't the only one who said that.
I just think its awsome how you act like you know everything because you've installed some HID's and your cousin works for a dodge dealership. Its not always what a person says, its how they say it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #18  
Viper37's Avatar
Viper37
Banned
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: The Communist Puppet State of Mexifornia
Default

Originally Posted by xskylinedx
your cousin works for a dodge dealership.
No, he work's at Chrysler Corporate. But good try.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #19  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by jason.w
True, they had more HP on paper, but in real world contests, time and time again, the Dodge engine was more powerful. Just seemed to be able to outdo the supposedly more powerful Chevrolet engine, except in MPGs. Up until they got rid of the 350 pretty much in 1999. Did they have it in their commercial side or something until 2001?

Now the 5.3L and 6.0L engines are whole different story.
Ive driven many varieties of both and ive found the vortec motor to be more potent than the magnum. Ford, dont even bother, their mod motors are horrible.

Isnt the 318 only down like 10 or 20hp from the 360? My fathers truck is a very good truck but it wouldnt win any pulling or power contest by a long shot. But its a hell of a workhorse.

I wont deny that chevy has its downsides, ill be the first to point them out but i just cant agree that the magnum 360 is more powerful than the 350 vortec. And yes they kept the 305 and the 350 vortecs up to 01. I plan on sticking a 350 vortec in my boat next year.

And i agree, the new LS series motors 4.8, 5.3, 5.7 and 6.0 are a different story, a much, much better story.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #20  
Viper37's Avatar
Viper37
Banned
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: The Communist Puppet State of Mexifornia
Default

Originally Posted by MonteC
i just cant agree that the magnum 360 is more powerful than the 350 vortec.
I agree. Too much of the Militant anti-chevy/ford fanboyism is coming into play here.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.