2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Anyone have/considered this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #1  
Ram2K1's Avatar
Ram2K1
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 1
From: TN
Question Anyone have/considered this?

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

I am thinking about saving my pennies for one of these...a much better design than the kegger and no more worry about a plenum gasket ever!

Anyone have one?
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:49 AM
  #2  
olyelr's Avatar
olyelr
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 1
From: Elk Rapids, MI
Default

Don't know, but I would like some first hand info as well. By the time you buy a Hughes plenum repair kit and spend all the time modding the stock kegger to work decent, this may just be a dang good deal (as long as it works well).



Anyone with first hand information?
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #3  
dodgeram07's Avatar
dodgeram07
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Default

if that's the m1 intake manifold, and i think it is ( it just look diff to me).. you lose bottom end power on a stock motor... that if it the same manifold i'm thinking of.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
talon6's Avatar
talon6
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2
From: ohio
Default

i would say the same thing. i think it will move your power higher in the rpm's. somebody with more knowledge than me will chime in though.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
Rex-TheDOGG's Avatar
Rex-TheDOGG
Captain
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

I had something just like that on my old 69 Chevy PU with 350-4bbl. I hated it because you had to wind up the engine to get the truck to move. No torque at all. Still up in my attic somewhere.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
Ram2K1's Avatar
Ram2K1
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 1
From: TN
Default

That one is not the M1...this is the M1:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...3+&appfilter=1

The only thing that I dislike about the one I posted is that it lists the basic operating range at 2K-6K RPMs. The M1 on Summit is also listed as a carb'd intake instead of fuel-injected.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #7  
Rex-TheDOGG's Avatar
Rex-TheDOGG
Captain
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

Ok. Dual-plane. Much better.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #8  
Laramie1997's Avatar
Laramie1997
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 5
From: Springfield MO
Default

Originally Posted by Ram2K1
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

I am thinking about saving my pennies for one of these...a much better design than the kegger and no more worry about a plenum gasket ever!

Anyone have one?
It looks good but on the mopar site they warn that you might have hood clearance problems on a stock hood
I cant find the exact part of this site is was on but I know it was there.
http://www.moparsupercenter.com/
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
Wickedwiggles's Avatar
Wickedwiggles
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

do they have a dual plane fuel injected? I am told those create better torque than the single if so do you have the part number haven't been able to find.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #10  
Ram2K1's Avatar
Ram2K1
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 1
From: TN
Default

Wickedwiggles: I don't think Summit offers a dual-plane fuel-injected...only carb.

Laramie1997: I will check through that site. Summit lists it as a direct-replacement for the magnums, so I was thinking it should be okay, but I will check...thanks for the link.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM.