2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

To whom it may concern: Chrysler 5.2 vs gm 5.3!

Old Jan 21, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #51  
360dodgeram360's Avatar
360dodgeram360
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Default

when you use the calculator on the page and enter the track at 84.9 degrees the DA is 1948'. For stock engines the corrected time is 13.567. i'm not saying that's not a good time but even with the nitrous and 4:10 it just isn't a 13.0 sec run. a cam adds 50-60hp the nitrous added 100hp.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #52  
CaptCameltoe's Avatar
CaptCameltoe
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Naples Fl
Default

Where does it say that was a nitrous run? I'll msg the guy and ask, but again I ask you to go over there and just look at the times those guys are turnin in. They have time slips and vids to back themselves up? I don't see many of those over here and I know I wouldn't even waste my time runnin my 318 sport at the track, 15's is slow no matter how you slice it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #53  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

I still want to see some 5.2l timeslips.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #54  
dodgeram07's Avatar
dodgeram07
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Default

i can run 15's,,, but i need a 3sec head start.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #55  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids-28/

A whole section devoted to swapping the LS series engine (4.8, 5.3, 5.7, 6.0) into EVERYTHING. I dont see many people banging down doors to stick a 5.2 or 5.9 into much of anything.

I wonder why that is?
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #56  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

expensive and limited aftermarket support.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #57  
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
expensive and limited aftermarket support.


LOL! Couldnt be farther from the truth!
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #58  
CaptCameltoe's Avatar
CaptCameltoe
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Naples Fl
Default

I think he was answerin your question lol I love the 5.2/5.9 magnum engines, they are perfect in old dusters,darts etc for a nice strong street engine, but in these heavy *** trucks, they just ain't enough cubes. When you stroke and try to build them up too radical the PCM becomes the stumblin block to try and work around and usually from what i have seen on these forums and in person at disastrous results.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #59  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

yes I was answering the question as to why the 5.2 and 5.9s aren't commonly used. The 5.2 and 5.9 blocks are solid.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:09 AM
  #60  
Silver1500's Avatar
Silver1500
Professional
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

I dont want to change the subject, but i know that the PCM becomes a major problem when you get into more serious engine work with these trucks, but what would be the disadvantage to eliminating the PCM? That would get rid of that problem. I know there are obvious disadvantages like no more fuel injection, but anyone who has been around an older carbureted engine, knows that carburetors can be tuned very well and can match or exceed the performance of fuel injection with very little sacrifice of reliability. So other than the obvious reasons, what would be big disadvantage of removing the PCM?
I think a worked 360 or 318 with a carb would eat a 5.3 with equivalent mods....
 

Last edited by Silver1500; Jan 22, 2009 at 12:11 AM. Reason: SP
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.