2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

tip to adjust power band

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #31  
Ram_Me's Avatar
Ram_Me
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by PurplDodge
Dodgeram07 did a write up on it a while ago.
Yeah, I already read that one for the poor man TB. I don't have any buddies that would machine the TB for me for free.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:25 PM
  #32  
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 7
From: Lee County, North Carolina
Default

i machined one for free, but i still need to make bigger throttle plates so it isn't on my truck. the stock plates are 1.978" and i bored the TB out to 1.978, but the stock plates sit at a slight angle so they have a big enough gap for me to have an 1100 rpm idle, i guess the IAC can't compensate enough.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #33  
Ram_Me's Avatar
Ram_Me
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

How did you machine it yourself?
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #34  
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 7
From: Lee County, North Carolina
Default

milling machine.


 

Last edited by Sheriff420; Jan 22, 2010 at 11:52 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #35  
Ram_Me's Avatar
Ram_Me
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Very nice! Looks good! But I don't have a milling machine either. Oh well, I'll go with the fastman when I have the money.

Maybe I'll try to make friends with someone that could do this haha
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #36  
011500Ram's Avatar
011500Ram
Banned
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Death to the CSA!
Default

I'd mill mine myself, but I've read too many mixed things about that mod.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #37  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Originally Posted by 011500Ram
A 5.2 to 5.9 swap is not worth the work required. Its what... A 10hp gain?
The modifications/upgrades available for a 5.9 V8 are more numerous than a 5.2 V8. Plus, tuners can unlock more power out of the detuned "death flash" 5.9 then they can the detuned "death flash" 5.2, like Purpl stated. However, you do lose mileage.

A stroker kit might be better, as someone suggested, though.

The more free flowing exhaust the higher topend.
To a point. Make it to free flowing, and the air will begin to cool before it leaves the exhaust pipe. Pushing denser, cooler air out of the pipes is bad for an engine. Robs you of more power. This is the "backpressure" that people always mistakenly talk about. There is no backpressure in an exhaust system, it should be more accurately described as "air density."
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #38  
1fast2liter's Avatar
1fast2liter
Captain
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: beaver dam, wi
Default

well that or velocity.. the bigger the pipe the gasses loses velocity
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #39  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

But it loses velocity because of the air density increase, otherwise why would it lose velocity?
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.