2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Does the transmission have a design flaw?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 07:40 AM
  #21  
notanexit7's Avatar
notanexit7
Captain
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Maysville, NC
Default

I attribute my transmissions long life (232,750 and counting) to maintaining it since new. I think some people just didn't have that luxury since they are the second or third owners. I change my fluid and filter every 2 years. I do have a question though. if I install a cooler will that eliminate the use of the stock cooler? I'm doing the check valve and I might get a cooler
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 09:37 AM
  #22  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by Sheriff420
well there is one possible side effect, me and another guy on here have to wait a couple seconds after putting it in gear before it'll start to go. because the transmission doesn't start to pump fluid until it is taken out of park would be my guess on that one.

and i haven't heard of any problems with the 46rh. i believe those were put behind the cummins motors.
46rh is the same tranny pretty much only hydraulically controlled they were used in the first generation rams mainly...and I also have the issue on my 46re of having to wait to go after putting it in gear after its been sitting..
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; Dec 10, 2009 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #23  
gobbell1's Avatar
gobbell1
Professional
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland TN
Default

I got 150k out of my '96 46RE, before it needed rebuilding. It had 36k on it when I bought it in '98 and the PO had a 5th wheel attached, so I now he was hauling something heavy. Further, I've hauled over 100k lbs of dirt, mulch etc... in the bed over the 11 years that I have owned it, plus the occasional 16' trailer.

I say all this because, given what my truck has hauled, I am very pleased to get 150k out of the stock tranny before teardown. Further, when I tore into the tranny to rebuild it, the root cause of the failure was a single bearing assembly in the over-running clutch of the OD unit. All the gears looked great and the the frictions still had grooves.

So, for me, the 46RE worked fine. I changed the fluid/filter about every 40k miles and got 150k out of it. Further, I pulled it, rebuilt it and reinstalled it myself for only $400.

p.s. I've put 10k on it since rebuild and all is well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #24  
97tn4x4's Avatar
97tn4x4
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Default

I have seen 94 models with the 46re before.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #25  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by 97tn4x4
I have seen 94 models with the 46re before.
Where?

In 1994 the transmission was 36RH
In 1995 the 46RH
In 1996-on 46RE
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #26  
dakotas ram's Avatar
dakotas ram
Champion
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 2
From: NW Arkansas
Default

so, my tranny is superior to yalls? or no?
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #27  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by dakotas ram
so, my tranny is superior to yalls? or no?
I'm no tranny tech, and the only difference that I know of is that the 94-95s had a hydraulically operated valve body where the 96-01s had the valve body controlled by electronics. If you have maintained the transmission since day one, yes then, yours is superior.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #28  
dsertdog56's Avatar
dsertdog56
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
From: Just south of nowhere in Oklahoma
Default

I think in my 30 some odd years of driving I've destroyed a number of transmissions and most of them Mopars since thats what I drive.
If theres any design flaw to the old (now) 46RE it is that the casing of the old 727 was used but to squeeze 4 gears into a place where there used to be three means smaller, bands, fewer clutches and more heat. Add a lockup converter and the appropriate slippage and you have a recipe for disaster.
Thankfully most other brands have the same issue. My tranny guy tells me he sees 2 Fords and 3 GMs for every Dodge.
The check valve is a problem simply because lack of maintanence can cause it to plug, which also caused a lot of repeat failures when trannies were rebuilt. Stock coolers with thier small lines can also plug easily.
When I lived in Phoenix I used to change my tranny fluid twice a year and adjust the bands because I thought was really abusing my truck. Well, it still died at over 110 k...oh well. It's not the first Mopar tranny I ruined.
Probably won't be the last either.
Peace.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #29  
notanexit7's Avatar
notanexit7
Captain
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Maysville, NC
Default

so if you get an aftermarket cooler, the stock cooler is basically useless?
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #30  
Sheriff420's Avatar
Sheriff420
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 7
From: Lee County, North Carolina
Default

mine only has an aftermarket cooler and it stays around 150-160º in the summer.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.