2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

35's on stock ram

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #21  
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

You can run 33's with your stock gears, but you will notice a loss of performance. Won't be as bad as with 35's, but it will be there. Just depends on if you can live with that I guess. I ran 4.10's when I had 33's, and that was a great combo.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #22  
Gav1n8's Avatar
Gav1n8
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Alma, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 95MaroonMonster
i'm saving for a new...er truck, but not by cutting corners
lol well I'm not cutting the corners real sharp
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #23  
95MaroonMonster's Avatar
95MaroonMonster
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Gav1n8
lol well I'm not cutting the corners real sharp
whatever works i suppose
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 11:37 PM
  #24  
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

If you're going to lift your truck, at least do it right like all these guys have done.

http://128.83.80.193/scarysteering/index.html
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #25  
95MaroonMonster's Avatar
95MaroonMonster
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

crap thats scary
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 12:13 AM
  #26  
rideordie's Avatar
rideordie
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Silver_Dodge
You are certainly correct. It is absolutly "economically smarter" to do that, provided that in the end, you don't mind that your truck performs worse, handles worse, gets worse fuel economy, is less safe, and is guaranteed not to last as long. But hey, you have to make some sacrifices when making economically smart decisions, right? For people who take this approach, maybe sitting around counting their saved money helps them forget how horrible their trucks have become because they cut corners and tried to do it half-assed and on the cheap. Come to think of it, an even cheaper way is to just go drive your truck into a tree. That will also make your truck worse, but you don't have to invest in a budget lift to do it. Talk about economically smart.

Personally, I try to only do modifications to my truck that actually make it better then it was before. Might cost more, but hey, to each his own I guess.
+1. That was a great post.

Originally Posted by Silver_Dodge
If you're going to lift your truck, at least do it right like all these guys have done.

http://128.83.80.193/scarysteering/index.html
That site's hilarious - never seen that before.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #27  
dsertdog56's Avatar
dsertdog56
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
From: Just south of nowhere in Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by Silver_Dodge
You are certainly correct. It is absolutly "economically smarter" to do that, provided that in the end, you don't mind that your truck performs worse, handles worse, gets worse fuel economy, is less safe, and is guaranteed not to last as long. But hey, you have to make some sacrifices when making economically smart decisions, right? For people who take this approach, maybe sitting around counting their saved money helps them forget how horrible their trucks have become because they cut corners and tried to do it half-assed and on the cheap. Come to think of it, an even cheaper way is to just go drive your truck into a tree. That will also make your truck worse, but you don't have to invest in a budget lift to do it. Talk about economically smart.

Personally, I try to only do modifications to my truck that actually make it better then it was before. Might cost more, but hey, to each his own I guess.
I guess I don't get it....People have no qualms about spending a lot of money on thier motor or other areas of thier truck and then spend as little as possible on thier suspension just so one could squeeze 35's under his truck with 3:55's. Of course it works perfectly, other than a slight rub (FAILURE!) when its cranked. The rub is that scores of aftermarket suspension engineers who design and build suspension mods and recommend proper wheels and tires and factory designers must be wrong too.

Making "ecomonically sound" decisions regarding suspension mods which I interpret as "lets be ghetto" decisions saves nothing. If you have a truck that you aren't going to keep, get rid of it and buy something you want to invest in. Skirting issues of safety and personal responsibilty to others around you and your fellow enthusiasts is probable economy in other abilities as well.

Just sayin...
 

Last edited by dsertdog56; Dec 26, 2009 at 10:32 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #28  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by oct6454
So. . . i'm looking to do something similiar to what this guy is talking about. I'm looking for a 3in lift might go with the 3in lift inc. coils from topgunz and am hoping to run 33's. The other option is just a 2 or 2.5 in leveling kit and running 33's. If i do either of these will i have to be re-geared?
if you want it to drive like its got a 4 cylinder in it no you dont have to have it regeared....you can drive it that way waste gas and burn up the tranny then sell it to someone else who will then come here and say what a piece of **** their dodge ram is and complain about the lack of power and terrible shifting of the tranny with burned up clutches.... (trust me I speak from experience...drove my jeep around for a year without regearing...very stupid, when I finally had it done I was kicking myself in the head. Its very hard on the drivetrain)
31" tires you can get away with stock gearing and not mess things up, 33 and higher wirth a redneck lift? without regearing and its silly to even waste the money on bigger tires that will just make your truck a less capable poser piece of crap and help give these trucks an even worse rep than they already have...

I dont agree with the do it wrong and save money to do it later methode mentioned earlier....its best to just not do it at all....then you can take the extra money to wasted on bigger wheels and lift and wasted gas and put that towards your "new truck" where you can do it right.
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; Dec 26, 2009 at 06:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #29  
oct6454's Avatar
oct6454
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Is there any major difference in performance from getting the 3" lift with control arms coils and shocks as opposed to their economy lift. I'm no looking to spend less on a lift if its not what's best.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #30  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by oct6454
Is there any major difference in performance from getting the 3" lift with control arms coils and shocks as opposed to their economy lift. I'm no looking to spend less on a lift if its not what's best.
more flexibility offroad is the biggest advantage......that equals more wheels touching the ground at akward moments and less chance of them getting stuck spinning in the air...if your doing it just for looks you can go cheaper with like sat AAL's and coil spacers but they wont net you any more flexability and will actually give you poorer ride quality (not coil spacers but AAL's). Plus front end components will be at wrong extreme angles and wear faster....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.