2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Attention dodge forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #11  
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by jasonw
I will respectfully disagree with Miami here.
HOW DARE YOU?

















The "respectfully" part, I mean.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #12  
mjackson92rs's Avatar
mjackson92rs
Professional
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth PA
Default

I have a 95 2500 and it has the Dana 60 front axle if that helps at all.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #13  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

The OP also got our attention real quick with a crappy thread title, that is totally useless for anyone searching info about this hidden topic! LOL
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #14  
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by zman17
The OP also got our attention real quick with a crappy thread title, that is totally useless for anyone searching info about this hidden topic! LOL
Interesting that you mention this. One of the things that got me in hot water with the DF Gods was my habit of editing/rewriting thread titles for just this reason. I think it serves little purpose to have obscure thread titles like this. Not only does it force members to click on the thread to see what it is about (very selfish IMO), but the thread is basically useless in a search. For a technical forum where there is a lot of archived information readily available, this is inexcusable.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #15  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

+1...... A title like that belongs in OFF TOPIC ! But, who am I? Or you? Or us? LOL
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #16  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Originally Posted by Miami_Son
Interesting that you mention this. One of the things that got me in hot water with the DF Gods was my habit of editing/rewriting thread titles for just this reason. I think it serves little purpose to have obscure thread titles like this. Not only does it force members to click on the thread to see what it is about (very selfish IMO), but the thread is basically useless in a search. For a technical forum where there is a lot of archived information readily available, this is inexcusable.
It is excusable for one reason. He is a new guy still learning the ropes. This isn't some military operation where the new guys go through basic training before they get here.

We were all newbies once. I already PMed him a personal welcome, with a note attached letting him know about generic titles in the future.

Now, if he were a seasoned member of DF with hundreds of posts, you're right. Its inexcusable. Or if he did this repeatedly, again you're correct. However, he's not, and he hasn't.

BTW, this is a bit of a hijack. No more thread title talk in this thread please.
 

Last edited by jasonw; Mar 1, 2010 at 05:48 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 06:30 PM
  #17  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

NP....
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #18  
mr freeze's Avatar
mr freeze
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 419
Likes: 1
Default

That title scared me.I thought it was the government informing us we have mandatory cash for clunkers vehicles.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #19  
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

What I was referring to as inexcusable was the idea of leaving the thread title alone, not the poster's action. We want ALL members to use the search feature, but we do nothing to make it work better, which ends up making it useless and gives members, new and old, an excuse not to use it. I don't see why there's anything wrong with changing the title to something more search friendly and telling the poster the reason why the title was changed. Same with fixing misspellings in thread titles. Ultimately, the betterment of the forum is the motivation and people shouldn't be so quick to get their feelings hurt over it.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.