2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Dodge ram ride height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #21  
meanwhitemopar's Avatar
meanwhitemopar
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: stationed in nc
Default

ur comparing a ford mid size to a dodge full size... your going to sit taller.. oh and ill kill that ranger any day of the week...
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #22  
97r/tram's Avatar
97r/tram
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson Ga
Default

Nope, I'm not putting big assed mud tires on it...they're just 33's. hahaha
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #23  
EndIsNear's Avatar
EndIsNear
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Default

Lol 33's should prolly be the largest too. I agree that too much suspension on a 2WD does look funny, but it doesn't hurt to gain the extra clearance and beefy look does it? 3" looks good. 4" looks good. And now I'll see a 5" when his spindles are installed...
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #24  
meanwhitemopar's Avatar
meanwhitemopar
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: stationed in nc
Default

sorry, its just me, i dont see point in why a 2WD would need more clearance... its 2wd, if he hits anything, he shouldnt be there anyway...
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #25  
Dixie Mudslinger's Avatar
Dixie Mudslinger
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Lyman,SC
Default

eh i dont totally get the 2wd lifting but hey if you dont have a 4x4 make the best of whatcha got but yes lifting a 2wd in moderation seems ok to me i wouldnt put it 12 inches in the air and slap some 38" TSL's on it :P
 

Last edited by Dixie Mudslinger; Mar 4, 2010 at 07:13 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:13 PM
  #26  
meanwhitemopar's Avatar
meanwhitemopar
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: stationed in nc
Default

yea thats true i guess... still wotn keep up with me though
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #27  
Dixie Mudslinger's Avatar
Dixie Mudslinger
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Lyman,SC
Default

lol my off road edition wouldnt keep up with your swamp giant i would kill for a lift like that
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #28  
meanwhitemopar's Avatar
meanwhitemopar
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: stationed in nc
Default

lol... alot of people wish they had my lift... i can crawl like a rocker and bog like a swamper... and i still daily drive it... lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:09 PM
  #29  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Originally Posted by xxxcowxboyxxx
it depends....your sports, and off road edition sport trucks sat higher stock than an slt
I'm going to disagree with you guys here.

The Sport packages were cosmetic changes only, no suspension, drivetrain, etc. differences. Therefore, they didn't have different ride heights than a regular, non-Sport Ram.

The only difference in stock ride heights were 4x2 vs. 4x4 vs. Off Road Edition 4x4.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:23 PM
  #30  
meanwhitemopar's Avatar
meanwhitemopar
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: stationed in nc
Default

the SLT to the sport was mostly cosmatic, but the sport had differant shocks. almost all sprots came with a heavy duty shocks, and i know for a fact my truck when it was stock sat higher then an SLT on 33's, i had 265's and no suspention, and he had no suspention with 33X12.50's and i sat hgiher.. the offroad sat higher yet... cant remmber why, i think its the springs, thats why most lifts wont fit off roads, cause it will give 1-2 inchs lower then the advertised lift.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.