2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

1500 vs. 2500

Old Mar 6, 2010 | 12:41 AM
  #1  
all of 75's Avatar
all of 75
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Strawberry Fields
Default 1500 vs. 2500

Hi, i usually hang aroung the 3rd gen Ram area. I will be in the market for another ram for myself pretty soon. I want a 2nd gen for the solid axles. Now I am wondering whether to get a 1500 or 2500. I would be buying a quad or regular-cab-short bed. I like the power of a diesel but also like the size of a 1500.

I was wondering which would be better for off-roading? Which has fewer problems? What are the major differences? What axles do the 1500s have in front and rear (I heard the 2500s have Dana 60s up front with dana 70s in back)?

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2010 | 06:42 PM
  #2  
EricCartman's Avatar
EricCartman
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 1
Default

I think 35" tires is about the limit with the D44. Most folks seem to go with the 2500 because it is easier/cheaper to build a more bulletproof D60 in the front.

D70 would be nice in the rear because it is a full floater. Than means if you break a rear shaft, you can pull it out and still be able to drive (your wheel won't walk off the back).

The 2500 has wider leaf springs in the back... 3" vs 2.5" on the 1500 if I remember correctly.

Good luck,
Cartman
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 28
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

All 1500s have the Dana 44 up front and the Chrysler (Corporate) 9.25 in the rear.

For a 2500, as long as you buy a 1996 to 2002 2nd gen, and not a 1994 or 1995, your front axle will be a Dana 60, as Eric stated.

For the rear axle on a 2500 after 1995...
2500 w/ 5.9L V8: Dana 60
2500 w/ diesel and auto: Dana 70
2500 w/ diesel and manual: Dana 80
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2010 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default

go 2500.
dana 60 gives you a lot more options in selectable lockers, stronger axles, etc.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
Gerehead8's Avatar
Gerehead8
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Default

Like the size of the 1500 versus the 2500? They are the same size, the 2500 is just about 2" taller. If you are talking about off road capabilities 2" is a good thing.

Go 2500. You can get a 94-95 that has the Dana 60 up up front and a Dana in the rear. Only the gas V8's came in light duty and they are rare.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #6  
all of 75's Avatar
all of 75
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Strawberry Fields
Default

I didnt know that the 2500s were the same size. Thanks. Also, What kind of milage do the diesels usually get?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
yakkier's Avatar
yakkier
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 1
From: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Default

Depends on what you want to use it for, 2500 if you're going to be doing alot of heavy loads and serious towing.

1500 if it's mild loads and towing, also the 1500's are great offroad
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 10:17 PM
  #8  
all of 75's Avatar
all of 75
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Strawberry Fields
Default

Also, how similar are their (1500 and 2500) capabilities off-road to a Ford Bronco? Quad cab, short box, 4x4. Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #9  
dodgetrucker75's Avatar
dodgetrucker75
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: live oak, ca
Default

Originally Posted by Gerehead8
Like the size of the 1500 versus the 2500? They are the same size, the 2500 is just about 2" taller. If you are talking about off road capabilities 2" is a good thing.

Go 2500. You can get a 94-95 that has the Dana 60 up up front and a Dana in the rear. Only the gas V8's came in light duty and they are rare.
no there not, 2500 frames are taller than the 1500's, and yep, 94-95 cummins also have a d60 up front...
 

Last edited by dodgetrucker75; Mar 7, 2010 at 10:31 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 10:53 PM
  #10  
yakkier's Avatar
yakkier
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 1
From: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Default

the 2500 is heavier, 1500 can use alot of the 2500's suspenion parts also. 2500's are naturally higher than the 1500 so we can use their spring's to gain some extra height using the 2500's stock suspenion with minimal fab work, the front springs will fit with out any modding.

As far as the 4x4 i personally would rather have a 1500 off road, they'er lighter an takes alot less to move it in mud/sand.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.