2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Stupid Intake Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-09-2010, 08:53 PM
BowlerGT's Avatar
BowlerGT
BowlerGT is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stupid Intake Question

I see so many people running the 14x3 and thats cool but they are around $30 here at autozone/advance. Is there any reason no one runs the smaller 9" ones seeing as they are about half the price? This is really a budget truck and dont want to spend anymore then I have to thanks
 
  #2  
Old 07-09-2010, 09:00 PM
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
aim4squirrels is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Probably because they don't have as much surface area for filtration.

You'd have to calculate if a 9" filter is enough flow based on surface area and flow dynamics of the filter media.
 
  #3  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:10 PM
RM_Indy's Avatar
RM_Indy
RM_Indy is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

9x3" filter will give 84.75" surface area (minus rubber top/bottom)
14x3" filter will give 134.88" surface area (minus rubber top/bottom)

The 14" filter has about 60% more surface area.
Will stay cleaner 60% longer.
Air speed going through the filter material 60% slower possibly filtering better.
Will also have about 60% less restriction allowing motor to make noticeably more power

How much did that 9" filter really save you if it takes more throttle to get the same power? (less mpg possibly)
This is one of those cases where bigger is better
 

Last edited by RM_Indy; 07-09-2010 at 10:12 PM.
  #4  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:20 PM
BowlerGT's Avatar
BowlerGT
BowlerGT is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Factory filter is roughly 13.5 x 6.62 = about 89" surface area and some of the pipeing is smaller then that so wouldnt it be at least equal to stock? I'm not trying to start any argument but just stating
 
  #5  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:29 PM
rwisaacks's Avatar
rwisaacks
rwisaacks is offline
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BowlerGT
Factory filter is roughly 13.5 x 6.62 = about 89" surface area and some of the pipeing is smaller then that so wouldnt it be at least equal to stock? I'm not trying to start any argument but just stating
If it is equal then why bother wasting your money? I personally wouldn't spend any money on a mod and it still be the same as factory. Spend just a little more and get alot more airflow.
 
  #6  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:48 PM
J415's Avatar
J415
J415 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What's the point of doing the mod if your getting the same results as you do with the stock intake. Might as well just save your money and not do it at all.
Edit:damn you beat me to it.
 
  #7  
Old 07-10-2010, 09:05 AM
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
aim4squirrels is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The stock box is restrictive, even to a stock truck IMO. Going smaller would not be advisable.
 
  #8  
Old 07-10-2010, 12:32 PM
TheBigRedOne's Avatar
TheBigRedOne
TheBigRedOne is offline
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Box
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RM_Indy
9x3" filter will give 84.75" surface area (minus rubber top/bottom)
14x3" filter will give 134.88" surface area (minus rubber top/bottom)

The 14" filter has about 60% more surface area.
Will stay cleaner 60% longer.
Air speed going through the filter material 60% slower possibly filtering better.
Will also have about 60% less restriction allowing motor to make noticeably more power
The surface area makes sense, but the rest of that is ricer math.
 
  #9  
Old 07-10-2010, 02:44 PM
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
aim4squirrels is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

what's ricer math?

134.88"-84.75" = 50.13 sq/inches (difference in size between the filters)

50.13 (the difference)/84.75 (the smaller air filter's size) = .59150 ~ or roughly 60% increase in surface area over the 9" filter.
 

Last edited by aim4squirrels; 07-10-2010 at 02:49 PM.



Quick Reply: Stupid Intake Question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.