2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

13 mpg?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:32 PM
  #21  
Ramdude1's Avatar
Ramdude1
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

I have the 01 Ram 1500 stock with the exception of the K&N CAI... 81,460 miles..bought it new in 2000. I live in Central California, no hills...none. With the 87 octane i got 12 MPG driving like granny, manual trans. Put the 89, same station, same driving habit received 15.5 mpg...yup 15.5 ! Now using 91 octane, removed tailgate, tools, etc... will keep you posted. Hav'nt tried highway yet. Just trying to see what is the best I can get.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #22  
SunhawkRam's Avatar
SunhawkRam
Rookie
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Default

right now I am getting about 15.4 in the city, but I also have the 2wd and a heavy lead foot...
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #23  
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Default

Originally Posted by SunhawkRam
right now I am getting about 15.4 in the city, but I also have the 2wd and a heavy lead foot...
That really makes no sense. 15.4 is good city mileage for a 5.2. 2WD increases fuel economy. BUT, having a lead foot would make your mileage worse.

So I don;t understand what you were trying to say here.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #24  
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Default

Originally Posted by Ramdude1
I have the 01 Ram 1500 stock with the exception of the K&N CAI... 81,460 miles..bought it new in 2000. I live in Central California, no hills...none. With the 87 octane i got 12 MPG driving like granny, manual trans. Put the 89, same station, same driving habit received 15.5 mpg...yup 15.5 ! Now using 91 octane, removed tailgate, tools, etc... will keep you posted. Hav'nt tried highway yet. Just trying to see what is the best I can get.
something must be extremely wrong with your engine to have 89 octane give you a 25% increase in your fuel economy.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #25  
SunhawkRam's Avatar
SunhawkRam
Rookie
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Default

well when I drive like a grandma....I could get 16-16.3 mpg....I had to help my buddy move and raced A LOT...and got about 14.6....I actually got 19.1 on the interstate at 65mph for about 200 miles or less. Needless to say...I love my 318!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #26  
Ramdude1's Avatar
Ramdude1
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

something must be extremely wrong with your engine to have 89 octane give you a 25% increase in your fuel economy.
I agree...I'm not so sure it was just the gas. I probably could have stretched the 87 test to 13 -13.5 but its just when I filled up again. I removed the shell (120-150 lbs ??) when I did the 89 test so I'm sure that helped (I know, did not mention earlier, sorry). I probably could have done 16 or 17 on the 89 test if I stretched this one too, but I don't like walking. With the 91 test I have also removed the tailgate (50 -60 lbs ??)and some tools I carry (60-70 lbs ??). Anyway those are my numbers
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #27  
dodgeman52's Avatar
dodgeman52
Captain
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: clayton, north carolina
Default

mythbusters tried removing the tail gate and they actullay got worse gas milage because of something to do with air flow
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #28  
ramit99's Avatar
ramit99
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Cobourg,Ontario , Canada
Default

Put your foot right into all the time and you should be able to get well below 10mpg.lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #29  
Ramdude1's Avatar
Ramdude1
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

mythbusters tried removing the tail gate and they actullay got worse gas milage because of something to do with air flow
Yeah, I saw that one too. I am doing my own test just for my sake. When I am done with the 91 test, I will go back to the 87 octane with everything still off the truck and see the difference...again...if any.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #30  
wayne24's Avatar
wayne24
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: wny
Default

I just drove my 99 ram 1500 4x4 with the 5.9 home (ny) from South Carolina.I averaged 14.5 mpg on the highway.Now that I am just driving around home and to work I am lucky to get 11 mpg.
Wayne
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.