2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

285's :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #1  
MNRAM1500's Avatar
MNRAM1500
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default 285's :)

I went with the 285's over 265's and i'm happy with them for sure. I love the way they fill up the fenders so well looks awesome. I didn't see any mileage drop at all I'll post pictures asap
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:22 AM
  #2  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

You actually will most likely see better MPG highway.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:33 AM
  #3  
EndIsNear's Avatar
EndIsNear
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Default

I love my 285's too. My truck was a little more sluggish, but after a gear swap that won't be an issue anymore
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
MNRAM1500's Avatar
MNRAM1500
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

Your right i did see improvement everybody says big tires are bad but i beg to differ
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #5  
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
Legend
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 72
From: orangeville ontario
Default

depends on what you mean by big tires. the wider the tire the crappier the fuel mileage.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #6  
Gerehead8's Avatar
Gerehead8
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Default

I did not have the same results of improving fuel economy anywhere including pure highway. Going from 285/75/R16 A/Ts getting 13-13.5 at best on the highway to about 15.5 on the highway with 225/75/R16's all else being the same. While the smaller tires make the motor spin slightly faster they put significantly less load on the motor. A 265-285 step is minimal and I would expect the mileage variation to be minimal.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:34 AM
  #7  
JSTMoto's Avatar
JSTMoto
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Default

okay... so they are 11.2" wide. How tall are they, 32.8"??

Just saying that you have "285s" only means you have an 11.2" wide tire...

saying you have "285s" could even mean you bought a 31" tire....

Remember, the first number in a metric size is section width.

-JT
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 03:15 AM
  #8  
kuziwr's Avatar
kuziwr
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Default

I have 285/75/r15s on my ram, do you also have a problem with them rubbing the control arms?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #9  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default

less words. more pictures...
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #10  
iwhitne's Avatar
iwhitne
Record Breaker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 4
From: The Buckeye State... OHIO
Default

^agreed

I had 285 BFG A/T's great highway mileage and loved the RWL.. after 50,xxx miles I got some re-treads from tread wright.. went with 265's because I didn't want to wait 3 weeks for the 285's
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.