2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

replace the rocker arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 02-03-2011, 11:21 PM
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Silver_Dodge is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That pic is from awhile ago. It certainly doesn't look that nice now, but I still keep it clean.

The rockers where one of the most noticeable performance items i've tried. They are really awesome for the price in my opinion.
 

Last edited by Silver_Dodge; 02-03-2011 at 11:26 PM.
  #22  
Old 02-04-2011, 12:12 AM
J415's Avatar
J415
J415 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bekins01ram
Okay, I dont understand how the HS 1.7's will tack on a quick 20 HP. Guess I have to admit, I dont fully understand even what the rockers do. If anyone has the time to explain.
Simply put, the stock 1.6 moves the valve a distance that equals the lift measurement of the cam, times 1.6. So the 1.7 opens it a little bit farther.
 
  #23  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:55 AM
BIGBIRD85's Avatar
BIGBIRD85
BIGBIRD85 is offline
Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: douglasville, ga
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default another rocker arm question. sorry.

i was just interested in what the ratio 1.7 on the harland roller rockers i have ordered meant. the stock ones are 1.6. so did some research and came across the following...........

The benefit of increased rocker arm ratio is the valve is opened a little further and faster, allowing more air in and out of the engine, thus creating more power. According to the guys at Crane Cams, changing from a rocker ratio of 1.5 to 1.6 generally adds about 3 degrees of valve duration, and changing from 1.6 to 1.7 rockers adds another 1-2 degrees. The net result is you are effectively changing your cam specs without changing your cam.

Traditionally, stock rocker ratios are right around 1.5, with a standard increase being a change to 1.6 rockers. The rockers found on Dodge’s Magnum motors are already 1.6 from the factory. If bigger is almost always better, why not swap in a 1.7? On the old LA engines, this swap created pushrod clearance problems, because the pushrod’s angle of attack was changed enough to make contact with its hole in the head, meaning that 1.7 rockers required machining the heads. Magnum engines have enough clearance for the pushrod (Fig. 3), but there is a possibility that you could run into piston-to-valve clearance problems because the valve is opening further and faster. If you’re building a motor from scratch, clay on the top of the piston will let you know if the pistons should be fly-cut. Crane tested 1.7 rockers on an engine and didn’t encounter any clearance problems. Usually, when you go from stock 1.5 rockers to 1.6, there is enough clearance that you can get away with it, so it would seem that going from a factory 1.6 to 1.7 would have the same result. But if the engine was in the vehicle, and it was our vehicle, we wouldn’t chance it.

i know many of yall have changed to 1.7 rockers and have no issues. have yall heard of any issues? i have the 5.2 motor.
 
  #24  
Old 02-06-2011, 11:46 AM
dodgeram07's Avatar
dodgeram07
dodgeram07 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
  #25  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:17 PM
BIGBIRD85's Avatar
BIGBIRD85
BIGBIRD85 is offline
Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: douglasville, ga
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i ordered them already and will be here on tuesday!!! AWESOME!! i was just curious if anyone had any issues with the new rockers on a 318
 
  #26  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:37 PM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
drewactual is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Carteret NC
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm curious about your rig when it's done.. that 318 comes with a more aggressive cam than a 360.. (it doesn't take much to be more aggressive than the oe 5.9).. you'll likely gain a touch more than your average 5.9 does with this mod..

also, I may be wrong, but I think 96 and earlier rigs came w/ OE 1.5 rockers, and they bumped them to 1.6 in either '96 or '97.. If yours is running the 1.5's, and you bump to 1.7's, you're really going to see a difference!

keep us posted!
 
  #27  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:40 PM
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Silver_Dodge is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I read that same thing you posted, but i've never heard of anyone having any issues. I have the 1.7's, and have never had a problem.
 

Last edited by Silver_Dodge; 02-06-2011 at 02:10 PM.
  #28  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:45 PM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
drewactual is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Carteret NC
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

from what I've read, he won't smack pistons- he'll be good..

but thinkin' it through tells me this: though it's a computer friendly mod, it's going to take his 'puter longer to adjust.. Once they are in, and once he turns his engine by hand to make certain nothing is going to collide, and ultimately fires it up: she's going to cough like a dragon.. for a little bit.. but it will adjust and he'll see some really good gains.. given, that is, that he is running 1.5 rockers now and not 1.6's.. if he's running 1.6's, there wouldn't be that huge an adjustment... <- this is ALL my supposition and has no basis in experience, just thoughts..
 
  #29  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:07 PM
Gerehead8's Avatar
Gerehead8
Gerehead8 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

All dodge Magnum engines use the exact same rocker (1.6 ratio) as far as I know an this is the first thread I have ever heard different. I have have the HS 1.7 non adjustable rockers on a '94 318 and a '94 360 with zero starting or running or piston contact issues.
 
  #30  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:27 PM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
drewactual is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Carteret NC
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

'94 and '95 for certain used 1.5's..
 


Quick Reply: replace the rocker arms



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 AM.