2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.
Old Aug 4, 2015, 07:56 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: General Overview
Print Wikipost

turbo system for my 5.2L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #21  
sbrodacz's Avatar
sbrodacz
Professional
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
The idea generally with two smaller turbos, as opposed to one larger one is: Less turbo lag. Smaller turbines spin up faster than the large one.
I know turbos pretty well. I had an s2000 that I had built with two different turbo kits. Ran 666 hp on 110 oct.

Now adays with the newer turbos and the new billet wheels you can run a larger turbo with similar lag to a smaller turbo.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 10:31 AM
  #22  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,395
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by sbrodacz
I know turbos pretty well. I had an s2000 that I had built with two different turbo kits. Ran 666 hp on 110 oct.

Now adays with the newer turbos and the new billet wheels you can run a larger turbo with similar lag to a smaller turbo.
Yeah, the technology has advanced quite a bit since the "good ol' days".
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 10:10 PM
  #23  
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Default

Here is a good boost read from Marty (Formerly of KRC performance). He had a setup for 4 PSI of boost on a BONE STOCK setup (Stock kegger).
http://www.bionicdodge.com/bionic/in...p?topic=9467.0
RWHP: 308
RWTQ: 354

10 PSI: Holy CRAP!!!! look at those numbers.
RWHP: 413
RWTQ: 504

No intercooler, 110* inlet temp

This was on a rear mount turbo. 2500 for the setup, 60lb FMS injectors, t-76mm, dual 38mm wastegates, crank pulley and shorty headers TUNED BY SCT. So he did not use megasquirt.

That is a pretty flat torque curve for 4 lbs. I would be plenty happy with that cruising at 65 MPH.
 

Last edited by CPTAFW163; Feb 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 10:42 PM
  #24  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,395
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

Gotta do stuff to the motor to tolerate 10 pounds of boost though, else, it won't live long.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 10:58 PM
  #25  
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Gotta do stuff to the motor to tolerate 10 pounds of boost though, else, it won't live long.
But 4PSI!!! You figure if you are going to spend 2500, you can get heads/cam/tune. OR you can spend about 3K and get 4PSI. It would be pretty hard to get 308 RWHP from heads/cam/tune on our trucks as easy as 4 PSI of boost.

10 PSI, I would be getting head studs and a one piece intake. The bottom end can handle it if you don't race it.

However, with 10PSI, you will need a Mega Viper.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 11:05 PM
  #26  
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Default

Originally Posted by sbrodacz
I know turbos pretty well. I had an s2000 that I had built with two different turbo kits. Ran 666 hp on 110 oct.

Now adays with the newer turbos and the new billet wheels you can run a larger turbo with similar lag to a smaller turbo.
I thought that lag was a testament to not matching the turbo to your application?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #27  
sbrodacz's Avatar
sbrodacz
Professional
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by CPTAFW163
I thought that lag was a testament to not matching the turbo to your application?
That is part of it. But no matter what you do a larger turbo is going to have more lag than a smaller turbo no matter what your application is. The new billet wheels helps a lot with lag on the larger turbos.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:58 AM
  #28  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

Methinks that dyno is a bit optimistic. Although that turbo is pretty large for a stock 5.9, so yeah it'll make nice power at low boost but I think the boost threshold would be relatively high as well, I like getting into boost below 2k.

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Gotta do stuff to the motor to tolerate 10 pounds of boost though, else, it won't live long.
Headgaskets/bolts, that's about it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 12:04 AM
  #29  
Srtb8ked's Avatar
Srtb8ked
New Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

im looking to turbo my 1999 5.2 sport i want to run a remote mounted gt35 with inter cooler what do you recommend
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #30  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

I ran a remote for over 1.5 years, it does work. However I got tired of worrying about oil pump failure and moved to a front mount. I had a "cheap" pump die at 7k and replaced it with a $350 purpose built pump that lasted 29k till I switched. The pump probably would have been fine for a while longer but I hate worrying on long trips, it's not an off the shelf item and it's expensive.

Anyways, not familiar with Garrett part numbers and such but I'd suggest something with a 60-67mm compressor and a T4 P-trim turbine.

I never ran an intercooler on my setup (8PSI) and still don't. My temps were pretty reasonable, however with the front mount I will be installing mater/meth injection next week.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.