2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

rear axle swap with disc brakes??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 08-08-2011, 08:48 PM
kejobe's Avatar
kejobe
kejobe is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,241
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Ehh, geuss i'll save that for some other time...after a bunch of research. Thanks.
 
  #12  
Old 08-09-2011, 12:07 AM
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
dhvaughan is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gainesville, Ga.
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

disc brakes became available in 2001-1/2
if you find one, i'd grab it. i'd be a great upgrade if you can make it work.

check the little things. e-brake cables. abs sensor.
 
  #13  
Old 08-09-2011, 01:55 AM
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Buck Slayer is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Waller, Tx
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what yall are saying is yes it will probably work, but just not entirely correctly?
 
  #14  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:21 PM
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
dhvaughan is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gainesville, Ga.
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

the 2500 swap won't be a direct fit. you'll have to address different spring widths (2.5 vs 3), shackles, perches, etc. also probably/maybe the drive shaft? i wouldn't think the disk brakes would be any harder than the other items and it'd be a great addition.
 
  #15  
Old 08-10-2011, 03:24 AM
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Buck Slayer is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Waller, Tx
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackJ
Three master cylinders are used in BR models. The
differences between' them concern cylinder bore size
and fluid reservoir capacity.
• The master cylinder in 1500 models has a 28.6
mm (1.125 in.) bore.
• The master cylinder in 2500 and 3500 models
has a 31.8 mm (1.252 in.) bore.
Although the master cylinders used in 2500 and
3500 models have the same bore size, they have dif- .
ferent piston stroke lengths and fluid reservoir
capacities.


This is from the 96 FSM, not saying you will have problems but something you may wanna look at.

All 1500 models and early year production
2500/3500 are equipped with rear drum brake assemblies.
They are two-shoe, duo-servo units with an
automatic adjuster mechanism.
Drum brake assemblies used:
² 1500 models: 11 x 2.25 in.
² 2500/3500 models: 12 1/8 x3.5 in.

From the 2001 FSM

but what does all of this add up to?? would the master cylinder be sufficient? also then i would have 2500 rotors in the back and 1500 in the front? Unless maybe the ld ones would work all the way around??
 
  #16  
Old 08-10-2011, 12:43 PM
JackJ's Avatar
JackJ
JackJ is offline
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am fairly certain toy can put the dual piston brakes from a 3500 on the 1500, or maybe it was from the 2500. The larger bore means more fluid flows thus increasing pressure.

If it were me doing this I would completely change over the entire system. The lines should be the same size (don't quote me on that) where you would have your issues would be wheel cylinders, and proportion valves. That us if you go to the lager MC, with the larger brakes I would think you would not gain much using a smaller MC.



Go to the DIY section, you can DL this and the parts books for your trucks.
 

Last edited by JackJ; 08-10-2011 at 12:46 PM.
  #17  
Old 08-10-2011, 01:02 PM
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Buck Slayer is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Waller, Tx
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackJ
I am fairly certain toy can put the dual piston brakes from a 3500 on the 1500, or maybe it was from the 2500. The larger bore means more fluid flows thus increasing pressure.

If it were me doing this I would completely change over the entire system. The lines should be the same size (don't quote me on that) where you would have your issues would be wheel cylinders, and proportion valves. That us if you go to the lager MC, with the larger brakes I would think you would not gain much using a smaller MC.



Go to the DIY section, you can DL this and the parts books for your trucks.
well if i could go without having to upgrade the master cylinder and still be able to get discs in the back it would be awesome!
 
  #18  
Old 08-10-2011, 01:38 PM
JackJ's Avatar
JackJ
JackJ is offline
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Slayer
well if i could go without having to upgrade the master cylinder and still be able to get discs in the back it would be awesome!

Rear Disc Brake Rotor
2500/3500
323.5x30 mm (1.18 in)

Front Disc Brake Rotor
1500 4x2
304×30 mm (11.96×1.18
in.)

Wheel Cylinder Bore Size
1500
25.4 mm (1.00 in.)

Wheel Cylinder Bore Size
2500/3500
25.4 mm (1.00 in.)

Brake Booster
Type
1500/2500 Gasoline
Engines
Vacuum Dual Diaphragm
 
  #19  
Old 08-10-2011, 01:46 PM
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Buck Slayer is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Waller, Tx
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so its about the same?? the discs are just a hair bigger? did i read that right
 



Quick Reply: rear axle swap with disc brakes??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.