Are Bosch o2's really THAT bad?
That's interesting. The obvious next question that info raises is: would faster sensors offer some performance advantage? I don't know much about the control loop in these trucks but I've read that slow O2's are all that is necessary with my 5.0 ford for example. ie faster wont buy you anything.
All you can do is try everything under the sun while trying to be scientific abut it....which costs a fortune by the time you try everything and document the results.
Rock Auto lists two NTK O2 sensors for the 1997 1500 5.2L (pre-cat)
#23506 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length)
#23151 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/18" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)alyst Sensor (w/18" Length)
There is no illustration (which I'm certain I can find in a moment with a Google search), but IIRC, for a 1997 is should be the latter, correct?
#23506 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length)
#23151 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/18" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)alyst Sensor (w/18" Length)
There is no illustration (which I'm certain I can find in a moment with a Google search), but IIRC, for a 1997 is should be the latter, correct?
Rock Auto lists two NTK O2 sensors for the 1997 1500 5.2L (pre-cat)
#23506 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length)
#23151 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/18" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)alyst Sensor (w/18" Length)
There is no illustration (which I'm certain I can find in a moment with a Google search), but IIRC, for a 1997 is should be the latter, correct?
#23506 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/12" Length)
#23151 Pre-Cat (Upstream); Pre-Cat (Upstream)Calyst Sensor (w/18" Length); Pre-Cat (Upstream)alyst Sensor (w/18" Length)
There is no illustration (which I'm certain I can find in a moment with a Google search), but IIRC, for a 1997 is should be the latter, correct?
im still not sold on the uphill performance either. is it hella better then before the plenum fix? yes. does my 5500lb suburban have better feeling performance from a smaller engine, yes.
guess i need to save my pennies for a hemifever tuner
that might be down the line as well! i might have to rob both my daughters piggy banks for those!
im guessing my truck was neglected due to everything that i've had to do. is there anything else cheap that would need to be done (fuel filter, anything to do with fuel in general, seafoam, additives to clean out crap, etc.?
23151 connector is round:
im guessing my truck was neglected due to everything that i've had to do. is there anything else cheap that would need to be done (fuel filter, anything to do with fuel in general, seafoam, additives to clean out crap, etc.?
Last edited by blackbeasst; Aug 13, 2011 at 03:02 PM.
The 3:55 gears is why it's a dog, even the owners manual says to turn OD off when going up a hill. My 98 was a pos with them, the 2000 has 4:10's and on the same roads/hills it has tons of power going up those same hills. No down shifting or turning off OD. Unless of course I get stuck behind Grandma, LOL.













