2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

SCT Tuning and Seafoam.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 02:10 PM
  #41  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

Less,

Real world compression ratio went down when you blew off the 1/8" of carbon covering the piston tops.
Hemifever tune caused you to gun it more often, 12.8mph.

Probably accelerated just a hair better.
 

Last edited by aim4squirrels; Oct 2, 2011 at 02:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 02:14 PM
  #42  
EndIsNear's Avatar
EndIsNear
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by TheycallmeLaramie
Just seafoamed it Aim, worked great. Decent amount of smoke not as bad as some of the videos I have seen. Just Tuned it to 87 tune.

1) As is 14MPG @ 300 miles
2) Seafoamed with 87 SCT tune: ???? @ 300 miles anyone wanna guess?
Ill throw in a guesstimate of 16 mpg
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #43  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
Less,

Real world compression ratio went down when you blew off the 1/8" of carbon covering the piston tops.
Hemifever tune caused you to gun it more often, 12.8mph.

Probably accelerated just a hair better.
I was going to less, but for the only reason that he'd be in the throttle more, with all the new found power.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #44  
TheycallmeLaramie's Avatar
TheycallmeLaramie
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

So first day of driving with the 87 tune, HUGE difference. I thought I noticed a huge difference with the headers and plenum fixed, well damn. i have to touch the gas pedal half as much now going slowly through parking lots, and the throttle response I would say overall a 30% increase. First time ever i almost fishtailed my truck accelerating hard out of a turn (new tires too). Can't wait to see the 91 tune. Oh and the reason why I said I was going to test the MPG with 300 miles under each tune is that the first 40-50 I figured Id go nuts testing and the last 250 will be 65 mph highway. This way I can drain my gas tank of all the inferior gas to get a better estimate of mpg. Seafoam produced a decent amount of smoke but not as much as I had anticipated. Ill post a pic maybe tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #45  
chadhager03's Avatar
chadhager03
Captain
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Default

I'm curious as well to how much it goes up. But damn you were getting 14 mpg before? I hope that's mainly hwy lol
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:18 PM
  #46  
BackwoodsRam's Avatar
BackwoodsRam
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

ill bet his mileage wont go down very much until the higher octane tunes. i know with my superchip on 91 i burn gas at maybe 7 mpgs, but thats also due to having a really heavy right foot
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 06:20 PM
  #47  
TheycallmeLaramie's Avatar
TheycallmeLaramie
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Ok, Ok, I know its been foooorreeevver since I posted, and I do feel like an a$$ so dont make me feel any worse peoples :P I'm about to get married, went on a huge vacation and lot of stuff happening in my life. Anyway the best part is that I'm back, hopefully with a vengeance. So heres my results:

Stock 300 miles driven - 14mpg
Comments Mostly all regular driving 65mph nothing crazy

87 Tune: 297.7 miles driven 21.880 gallons used 13.6 mpg
Comments: Driving like a bat out of hell! Loving this new found power.

87 Tune driving normal : 16-18 mpg

89 Tune: 285.4 miles driven 22.085 gallons used 12.92 mpg
Comments: Considerable increase from 87 as far as initial acceleration, Slight higher RPMS at 65mph driving like crazy still :P

89 Tune driving normal 13.8 mpg

91 Tune: 292.4 miles driven 22.607 gallons used 12.93 mpg
Comments: Considerable increase in all over performance I would say 30-40% more response then stock, 25% more response then 87 and about 10-15% more response then 89. Definitely super fun to drive on!!! So much that I dont care about the price of gas, I leave it on 91 tune. In about 10 full tanks ive reached as high at 14.5 mpg driving very moderately on this tune, and about 11.5 if I do all city driving and drive like a bat outta hell. My last fill up was 304 miles driven 21.94 gallons used which is 13.85mpg.

SCT TUNE DEFINITELY WORTH IT! I wouldn't hesitate twice to go with this product through hemi-fever.

Hope all is well with all you fellow D-F'er. Good to be back.

Next upgrades: 90 to 120amp alternator and fixing a vacuum leak somewhere ( stuck on defrost)
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #48  
gdstock's Avatar
gdstock
Legend
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Wow. Really busy! Congrats on getting married, and hope vacation went well.

Good to see your results form SCT tune. 2 to 4 mpg over stock is a pretty good increase, and will pay for tune easily, depending on how many miles you drive!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 06:46 PM
  #49  
TheycallmeLaramie's Avatar
TheycallmeLaramie
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Well that all depends on how you drive. Plus once you put the 91 octane tune on, you wont go back unless your broke. If your broke you wouldn't of bought the SCT in the first place. However getting 14mpg stock, and 14mpg on 91 octane driven very moderately is good imho, because when you need the power you got it and screw the mpg. Thanks for the nice thoughts gd Really love the DF people, such a wonderful group of people!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.