2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

mind blown, 2wd lift kits?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:09 PM
  #51  
dlyter09's Avatar
dlyter09
Champion
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg,PA
Default

Originally Posted by dodge dude94
^Hey, I talk about Geo Metros.
Thats still ban worthy
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:14 PM
  #52  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,549
Likes: 4,230
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by jmbishop
Oh I know, this is why we can't have nice things.
Like air that we can breathe... Keep in mind, in 68, seat belts were optional too......

I have a 4x4 because there are occasions when I need it. I can't afford to keep a vehicle for every purpose I might need one for, so, I have a truck, because I need to haul stuff far more frequently than I would like, and I have 4x4 because the weather gets crappy here. A 2wd truck will not do as well in snow and crappy conditions as a 4x4.

Also, I want 4x4 because I like to go off road, a 4x4 will ALWAYS be more capable than similarly equipped 4x2 in the condtions that I see here. so, 4x4 for me. Now, I probably really didn't need a 3/4 ton.... but, strangely enough, there have been a couple times were even THAT was required......

People drive what they do because that is what they want/could afford/was available at the time/etc. Any one can be better than any other, it just depends on what you want to use it for. If you live someplace where it never snows, and you don't go off-road, a 4x4 would certainly suit your needs... etc.

There is no real debate here, what's 'best' for one person, may not be what's 'best' for the next guy. So, let's just leave that dead horse lie please.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:15 PM
  #53  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by dodge dude94
Does that mean my truck is a 3WD, since I have an LSD?

yup...same setup I have... if you havent had you LSD rebuilt yet its likely not working anymore...the clutch packs wear out quickly...
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:19 PM
  #54  
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dlyter09
Thats still ban worthy
Awww. You're no fun!
Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
yup...same setup I have... if you havent had you LSD rebuilt yet its likely not working anymore...the clutch packs wear out quickly...
I'm still spinning both tires.
So it works.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:20 PM
  #55  
jmbishop's Avatar
jmbishop
Professional
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
and take all the manditory safety and epa crap they have to add by law to todays vehicles and I bet that 69 camaro outweighs the new ones... bottom line a stock 2010 camaro ss will smoke any stock 69 camaro. (and do it more reliably with less fuel).. the hp ratinga are on the old system and are inflated.


4wd's are really only 2wd and 2wd's are really only 1wd in sticky situations unless there are LSD units or lockers involved...
They can still build cars that meet safety standards and are light weight. In 1984 GM released a affordable 2800lbs car with no airbags, had a 5 star crash test rating and even beat volvo in 1984 on safety. Unfortunately GM didn't do well with the car only selling it for 5 years but the technology still lives on today in the corvette.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:23 PM
  #56  
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

^What car was that?
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:23 PM
  #57  
jmbishop's Avatar
jmbishop
Professional
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
There is no real debate here, what's 'best' for one person, may not be what's 'best' for the next guy. So, let's just leave that dead horse lie please.
Agreed.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:28 PM
  #58  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by jmbishop
They can still build cars that meet safety standards and are light weight. In 1984 GM released a affordable 2800lbs car with no airbags, had a 5 star crash test rating and even beat volvo in 1984 on safety. Unfortunately GM didn't do well with the car only selling it for 5 years but the technology still lives on today in the corvette.
the citation? I have an 84 vette actually... now that is an underpowered racecar... handles like a slot car but very underpowered..(very reliable DD in the summer though and gets great mpg for a 350..)
A lot has changed in safety regulations since then... so have star crash levels... airbags are mandatory now not optional...
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:37 PM
  #59  
jmbishop's Avatar
jmbishop
Professional
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From:
Default

With the addition of airbags it would only test better.


Originally Posted by dodge dude94
^What car was that?
Pontiac Fiero. The fiero was the first car designed with a full space frame.

Fiero space frame


Vette space frame
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 04:42 PM
  #60  
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jmbishop
With the addition of airbags it would only test better.



Pontiac Fiero. The fiero was the first car designed with a full space frame.

Fiero space frame

Vette space frame
I was thinking Fiero, but wasn't sure.

I thought they looked interesting.
But didn't they lack power?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.