2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Fuel Mileage ,Power Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #11  
cc12v's Avatar
cc12v
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

OK I get it ....fuel mileage is going to suck regardless. What about swapping to a 5.9 with and " RV" cam? Would I see a night and day difference in towing and power or should I drop a cam in the existing 5.2 engine and buy a SCT.
I've been told buy local Mopar drag racers not to waste a dime on the 318, put your money in a 360.
Your thoughts.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 09:33 PM
  #12  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,458
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Well, there is the old adage: "nothing beats the almighty cubic inch."

The 318 IS a capable motor, but, dollar for dollar, you get more power from more cubes. That's just the way it is. The funniest part is.... fuel economy is pretty similar between the two engines.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 09:37 PM
  #13  
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
Legend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 4
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default

There are a few guys here that will tell you the 318 responds to engine mod's better then the 360......
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 09:38 PM
  #14  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,458
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

I think stock, the 318 is higher compression, or some such.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 10:52 PM
  #15  
jswain's Avatar
jswain
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

I have a 98 360 4 X 4, and had an 01 318 2wd work truck. The 360 truck can get 14 mpg if all hwy. I never got over 11 mpg with the 318 2wd 01. I don't know if it was geared lower, had the deathflash, was just a lemon, or all of the above.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 05:46 AM
  #16  
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
Legend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 4
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by jswain
I have a 98 360 4 X 4, and had an 01 318 2wd work truck. The 360 truck can get 14 mpg if all hwy. I never got over 11 mpg with the 318 2wd 01. I don't know if it was geared lower, had the deathflash, was just a lemon, or all of the above.
The '01 came with death flash from the factory, and if the '98 ever went the dealer for any work it was re-programmed with the death flash too.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #17  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by stewie01
The '01 came with death flash from the factory, and if the '98 ever went the dealer for any work it was re-programmed with the death flash too.
Which I'm gonna point out again is exaggerated to be worse than it is... Beeker did multiple runs on a dyno comparing death flash to the different canned sct tunes...maxumim difference was 4hp and 20lbs of torgue and an almost identical power curve... I believe that was also a 318...
It depends on driving style but 3.55 gears can hurt mpg with 33" tires (although not as much with a stick again depending on driving style) and certianly isnt helping in the power dept....
 

Last edited by Augiedoggy; Feb 21, 2012 at 09:15 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 09:21 AM
  #18  
Josh_Putman's Avatar
Josh_Putman
Professional
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Big Rapids, MI
Default

My dad always said, "There's no replacement for displacement!"

That being said, I'm running a 318, and getting around 13 - 13.5 on average. Just went back to a smaller tire, and I'm curious to see what that does for me.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.