2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Fastman t body 50mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-06-2012 | 09:15 AM
Adobedude's Avatar
Adobedude
All Star
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 907
Likes: 2
From: Corrales, New Mecico
Default

Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
52mm is a totally different ballgame...only benificial if you have a 360 with mods to help it breath better like a better flowing exhaust and heads or at least 1.7 rockers.. to get the air out as fast as it gets in.... its not recommended for stock 360's or mild 318's...you actually lose power throught the low and mid range..with the latter.
I have a 52 on the stock 5.9 in my Ram, it's pretty hard to over TB these things, all it is air, it's not like a carb.
 
  #22  
Old 03-06-2012 | 09:24 AM
mccart's Avatar
mccart
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: cedar hill mo
Default

How much $$$ does the fastman cost?
 
  #23  
Old 03-06-2012 | 09:28 AM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
Site Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 24
From: Sioux Falls, SD
  #24  
Old 03-06-2012 | 10:13 AM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
Champion
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Cape Carteret NC
Default

was there something wrong with your stock TB?

The only gain with a bigger one is 'more air quicker', which can be remedied with the smaller one with more pressure on the skinny pedal.. wayWAY up top you get more air, but, honestly, how often are you guys above 5kRPM?

the 'throttle response' is simply because you're tossing more air quicker.. the stock TB narrows from 50mm above the butterflies to 46mm below to create a laminar flow- to smooth the turbulence out, so to speak.. it doesn't really matter with a kegger manifold because the 'plenum' or 'air-reservoir' is huge and basically without any flow enhancers, but I'd venture that it absolutely would on a M1 or Air-Gap.. a matter of fact, that laminar flow feeding a a-g or m1 would likely make up for the missing mm's in the orifice opening..

the keg has a massive air reserve in that plenum- much larger than most intakes have.. it doesn't struggle for air unless it's wide open- and even then, the flow characteristics change dramatically.. I'd opine THAT change is a limiting factor inherit to the kegger more so than the size of the tb intake..

now if you were feeding a heavily modded engine (internal) or bored/stroked/boosted, that extra flow capacity would be a good thing- and an even better thing if it was something like 55-60mm north of the flies, and still tapering to something like 52~54mm south of the flies.. that laminar creating function of the taper is pretty significant..
 

Last edited by drewactual; 03-06-2012 at 10:16 AM.
  #25  
Old 03-06-2012 | 10:18 AM
mccart's Avatar
mccart
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: cedar hill mo
Default

So what would be the difference between the fastman and the big gulp from hughes? Looking at getting one or the other. Will i gain a whole lot with the 900 cfm with the big gulp? All i have done to my motor is the kegger mod
 
  #26  
Old 03-06-2012 | 10:27 AM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
Champion
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Cape Carteret NC
Default

what's the difference in distance you press your go foot? That's pretty much the difference you'd feel- instead of having to press it 1/4 way to reach 2200rpm, you'd only have to push it 1/8...

what you will LOSE, though, is the ability to minutely alter RPMs via go foot..

it's a floggin' waste of money unless you are feeding A LOT more air through the engine- supported with intake manifold, ported heads, bigger valves, bumpy cam, opened exhaust, ect.... and this os coming from someone who has a fastman 52..
 
  #27  
Old 03-06-2012 | 11:34 AM
ekaplan's Avatar
ekaplan
Professional
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: West Virginia
Default

^ agreed. I bought into the hype AND didn't return my core fast enough because of my motor swap. If ppl are looking into it I'd tell ya to put the money elsewhere for now, possibly the gas tank!
 
  #28  
Old 03-06-2012 | 07:04 PM
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by drewactual
was there something wrong with your stock TB?

The only gain with a bigger one is 'more air quicker', which can be remedied with the smaller one with more pressure on the skinny pedal.. wayWAY up top you get more air, but, honestly, how often are you guys above 5kRPM?

the 'throttle response' is simply because you're tossing more air quicker.. the stock TB narrows from 50mm above the butterflies to 46mm below to create a laminar flow- to smooth the turbulence out, so to speak.. it doesn't really matter with a kegger manifold because the 'plenum' or 'air-reservoir' is huge and basically without any flow enhancers, but I'd venture that it absolutely would on a M1 or Air-Gap.. a matter of fact, that laminar flow feeding a a-g or m1 would likely make up for the missing mm's in the orifice opening..

the keg has a massive air reserve in that plenum- much larger than most intakes have.. it doesn't struggle for air unless it's wide open- and even then, the flow characteristics change dramatically.. I'd opine THAT change is a limiting factor inherit to the kegger more so than the size of the tb intake..

now if you were feeding a heavily modded engine (internal) or bored/stroked/boosted, that extra flow capacity would be a good thing- and an even better thing if it was something like 55-60mm north of the flies, and still tapering to something like 52~54mm south of the flies.. that laminar creating function of the taper is pretty significant..
youve got that backwards... they openings are smaller ABOVE the butterfly plates which are 50mm... and honestly more flow through them can help a bit but depending on what other mods have been done the abundance of air can hurt or help... this is why places like fastman dont recomment a 52mm on a stock engine... it does hurt more than it helps in everyday driving in...that situation... I do believe there is enough evideance to prove that any 5.2 or 5.2 with a better air intake system and exhaust can benefit from a 50mm throttlebody. especially the 5.9... intake keg size is really not the only factor for air flow... if the tb doesnt flow enough the air pressure in the intake just becomes more of a negative and restricts the flow available anyway? what good is a better flowing air filter if restrictions like tb bore and turbulance causing air horns hinder it? you have to have a good balance... the one size fits all oem size has to hurt performance on all but stock engines and one could even argue stock 5.9's which should be able to pump more air..
 
  #29  
Old 03-06-2012 | 07:08 PM
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by Adobedude
I have a 52 on the stock 5.9 in my Ram, it's pretty hard to over TB these things, all it is air, it's not like a carb.
I'm sorry but I believe this statment is just wrong.....
For the same reasons related to why the kegger mod and cutting down runner size kills hp and torque on the mid and lower rpm range.
 
  #30  
Old 03-06-2012 | 08:58 PM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
Champion
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Cape Carteret NC
Default

No, I'm not wrong.. the taper from 50mm to 46mm is inside/under the flies.. . Now, I wonder if you've ever actually handled one at all..
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.