2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2L Ram Motor In Dakota?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #31  
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
Thread Starter
|
All Star
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 2
From: Pinellas County, FL
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
In 98, the instrument cluster changed, and also how the PCM communicated with it, Dodge introduced the "Central Timer Module".... basically, you have a little network in your truck, and the CTM is the 'hub'. Earlier models don't have that... which makes them MUCH easier to retrofit.
+REP man this is some great stuff to know!

Are we sure there were no half-years for this CTM? I'm still shocked they did their math correctly (or took a loss) during the OBDII upgrade on January 1st 1996...

To summarize:
1995- OBD1
1996- OBD2
1997- OBD2 + more control over engine performance
1998- OBD2 + more control over engine performance & CTF network
 

Last edited by pinkfloydeffect; Apr 9, 2012 at 01:11 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #32  
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 4
From: Wild West
Default

The '96 model years started in '95 anyway... If they are out there, no ones ever talked about them here in all my ridiculous amount of searching.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 01:14 PM
  #33  
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
Thread Starter
|
All Star
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 2
From: Pinellas County, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 2x1972
The '96 model years started in '95 anyway... If they are out there, no ones ever talked about them here in all my ridiculous amount of searching.
I need someone to post a picture of their OBDII plug and also what to look for (#s etc.) to know if it has the CTM network or not.
 

Last edited by pinkfloydeffect; Apr 9, 2012 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 01:29 PM
  #34  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,467
Likes: 4,220
From: Clayton MI
Default

CTM may have started in 98.5.... but, I am not 100% sure on that. 96 and 97 trucks won't have it. Basically, if it has the digital odometer, it's gonna be complicated. Mechanical odometer, and you should be golden.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #35  
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
Thread Starter
|
All Star
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 2
From: Pinellas County, FL
Default

Good call; if I find a 98' I will check for a mechanical odometer!

If it comes down to a 95.5 I will check for OBDII, assuming the following information below is correct for Dakotas:

OBD1


OBD2:



Here is a sketch of my concept truck:
http://youtu.be/nC2Vahxg9Pc?hd=1
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 08:26 PM
  #36  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,467
Likes: 4,220
From: Clayton MI
Default

The shape is all you need to look at. Not every connector will have the same pinout... not even on the same vehicle line. Squareish is OBDI, rounded is OBDII.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #37  
Derek R. Tracey's Avatar
Derek R. Tracey
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Potential correction

Originally Posted by HeyYou
CTM may have started in 98.5.... but, I am not 100% sure on that. 96 and 97 trucks won't have it. Basically, if it has the digital odometer, it's gonna be complicated. Mechanical odometer, and you should be golden.
I own a '97 Dakota with a 5.2L Automatic. Build date is 04/15/97. It has the digital odometer. I new someone that replaced his '97 PCM with a '96 PCM, he gained horsepower and torque, but the Dash Cluster was inoperable.

Now that I am in a position to do some performance upgrades to my Dak, I'm not really sure what and where I can go to do What I would like to do, maybe more HP Torque, upgrade Trans and Rear axle.

Any ideas would be great, truck has 140k on it. ( purchased new with 147 miles, I am only owner )

Please email me derekrtracey@yahoo.com for help.

Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2012 | 05:37 PM
  #38  
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
Thread Starter
|
All Star
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 2
From: Pinellas County, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Derek R. Tracey
I own a '97 Dakota with a 5.2L Automatic. Build date is 04/15/97. It has the digital odometer. I new someone that replaced his '97 PCM with a '96 PCM, he gained horsepower and torque, but the Dash Cluster was inoperable.

Now that I am in a position to do some performance upgrades to my Dak, I'm not really sure what and where I can go to do What I would like to do, maybe more HP Torque, upgrade Trans and Rear axle.

Any ideas would be great, truck has 140k on it. ( purchased new with 147 miles, I am only owner )

Please email me derekrtracey@yahoo.com for help.

Thanks.
Try starting your own thread...
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #39  
Derek R. Tracey's Avatar
Derek R. Tracey
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

sorry about that, i kind of ran two posts together. the initial reply was to help someone else with their question.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 10:56 PM
  #40  
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
Thread Starter
|
All Star
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 2
From: Pinellas County, FL
Lightbulb

So much for the title...but now I'm really thinking if I'm going to do this I might as well make it a 360. Gas was a factor but if I was light footed I don't think there is much of a difference at all between a 318 and 360....it's probably just when stepped on or driven over 60mph?

If I kept all the regular 318 swap items in mind, what else am I branching into here? It's the same from the intake up correct? I can still use a 318 PCM/intake/everything? Block still bolts up like a 318? NV-3500 will fit with a 3.9/5.2 bell housing?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.