2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Does the Overdrive SUCK in these trucks? or is it me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 04:37 PM
  #11  
SilverSS's Avatar
SilverSS
Captain
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Default

What size tires and what gears do you have? What speed are you at when it downshifts? If I start to go up a hill in o/d at 45 or 50 then it will more than likely want to downshift. If I'm going faster it'll usually stay in OD.
 

Last edited by SilverSS; Oct 11, 2012 at 04:44 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 04:46 PM
  #12  
mantisman51's Avatar
mantisman51
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 1
From: Miracle Valley, AZ
Default

For me, it's at any speed. But then again, the small hills here may only be a 1/4 mile, but 5 or 6% grade. On the long 7 mile 5-7% grade, it actually holds it in OD. It's just the quick, little hills that slow it down fast and then it loses 5-8 mph and drops down and floors it. Also, just 265/70/16, which are Lincoln Town Car tires that weigh half of the Bridgestone Duelers I replaced.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 04:50 PM
  #13  
UnregisteredUser's Avatar
UnregisteredUser
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 6
From: Meeker, CO
Default

Originally Posted by RageGuy
One would think that higher RPM caused by having the OD off would use more gas..not the other way around.
Efficiency is not equal across the entire RPM range, so getting the engine into its more efficient RPM range saves fuel until you get up to the speeds where wind resistance becomes the more dominant factor.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 05:02 PM
  #14  
mantisman51's Avatar
mantisman51
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 1
From: Miracle Valley, AZ
Default

Maybe mine is an exception, but when accelerating or maintaining speed, it stays in the 1400-1700 RPM range. Until it's up to speed enough for OD to kick in. It still defies the law of physics unless the transmission is not shifting when programmed to. All the manufacturers have optimized shifting to remain in that optimal middle zone where HP and torque merge-usually around 1500 rpms.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #15  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

Lugging an engine can be just as bad for economy as revving too much. It all depends. My old explorer with stock tires and 3.27 gears got nearly 2MPG better when I stopped using 5th gear altogether. The factory doesn't always know best.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #16  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Even the owner manual say's to turn OD when coming up to a hill. Gear's are the problem, my 98 with 3:55's sucked.I had to turn OD off a 1/4 mile before the hill to get up it and mash the go pedal. My 2000 with 4:10s doesn't miss a beat and keeps speed(on those same exact hills, with no downshifting when in OD.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #17  
dsertdog56's Avatar
dsertdog56
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
From: Just south of nowhere in Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by hemifever
With SCT I can get you a little more power in o/d so it doesn't have to downshift so often.
I agree...tuner helped my truck a lot. Even when it down shifts now it doesn't drop out of TC lock out, just od. So I use less rpm to climb the same hills.
BTW, I have my od set to come in at 41 mph at light to part throtle. With the tuner that has helped mileage even more.

Thanks again Sean.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 08:35 PM
  #18  
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 4
From: Wild West
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
Lugging an engine can be just as bad for economy as revving too much. It all depends. My old explorer with stock tires and 3.27 gears got nearly 2MPG better when I stopped using 5th gear altogether. The factory doesn't always know best.
My dad keeps trying to tell me that it's impossible to get worse fuel economy in a higher gear than a lower one. I disgree. He says every study always proves he is right. Can we get a better explanation maybe? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 09:15 PM
  #19  
UnregisteredUser's Avatar
UnregisteredUser
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 6
From: Meeker, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Wombat Ranger
Can we get a better explanation maybe? Thanks
I already posted it, didn't I? The full explanation is long, but the short bit is that the greatest efficiency in most gasoline engines occurs at the RPM at which the engine makes right around 70% of its peak torque, which is usually right around 40% of red line RPM. Or right around 2,000RPM for our engines. Get too low in RPM and efficiency tanks due to pumping losses -- basically, making the engine fight to breathe through mostly closed throttle plates.

This stuff must be on the web somewhere. You might try finding it, printing some stuff out, and going off to win that argument with your pops.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2012 | 09:16 PM
  #20  
gdstock's Avatar
gdstock
Legend
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

My OD behaves better after SCT tune.....Do IT!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.