2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Alignment specs needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 02:17 PM
  #1  
34blazer's Avatar
34blazer
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo
Default Alignment specs needed

and yes, ive been searching. Im going to perform my own aligment due to every shop using the lazy "toe and go" method. Ram 2WD SS/T if it makes a difference. just want to know what some DIY'ers found to be a good setup for daily driving. the last shop I brought the truck to didnt touch the caster/camber after I specifically told them it will need to be adjusted, ball joints were replaced. well of course they didnt touch the caster/camber, just the toe. It pulls to the right and the tires are severly tapered. The truck doesnt haul much anymore so I dont need as much toe for towing. I was thinking 1/16" (or .10*) toe in and -.10* camber, caster will be tweaked to eliminate the pull to the right.

Thanks!

*edit* also looking for info on dropping the truck, I dont see any stickies for 2nd Gens. Just looking for possible parts sources and techniques.
 

Last edited by 34blazer; Apr 20, 2013 at 02:20 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
xjarhead69's Avatar
xjarhead69
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by 34blazer
and yes, ive been searching. Im going to perform my own aligment due to every shop using the lazy "toe and go" method. Ram 2WD SS/T if it makes a difference. just want to know what some DIY'ers found to be a good setup for daily driving. the last shop I brought the truck to didnt touch the caster/camber after I specifically told them it will need to be adjusted, ball joints were replaced. well of course they didnt touch the caster/camber, just the toe. It pulls to the right and the tires are severly tapered. The truck doesnt haul much anymore so I dont need as much toe for towing. I was thinking 1/16" (or .10*) toe in and -.10* camber, caster will be tweaked to eliminate the pull to the right.

Thanks!

*edit* also looking for info on dropping the truck, I dont see any stickies for 2nd Gens. Just looking for possible parts sources and techniques.
Pages 2-1 thru 2-7 of factory service manual, available for download on in the FAQ's section this site, has the info you need.

Dave
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
34blazer's Avatar
34blazer
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo
Default

Ok great, thanks. Also wanted to know if anyone has deviated from "factory specs" and improved the alignment?


*edit*

Not so much....LOL

https://dodgeforum.com/forum/faq.php...y&titlesonly=0

but thanks anyway
 

Last edited by 34blazer; Apr 20, 2013 at 03:20 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 03:49 PM
  #4  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

The only improve alignment procedure I know of is for a 4x4. For 2wd I'd stay with factory specs as stated.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 04:03 PM
  #5  
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
Legend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 4
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default

Here's a pic of my specs from yesterday, might help you, might not...

Name:  specs_zpsd8ca51ec.jpg
Views: 12975
Size:  78.6 KB
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
master tech's Avatar
master tech
Site Moderator & Tech
15 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,642
Likes: 108
From: Near Sacramento,ca
Default

ALIGNMENT



4 x 2 & 4 x 4

GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT lbs.

WHEEL BASE inches

PREFERRED CASTER ± 1.00°

PREFERRED CAMBER ± 0.50°

4 x 2 6,010 118.7 3.40° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,400 118.7 3.40° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,010 134.7 3.60° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,400 134.7 3.60° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,400 138.7 3.70° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,400 154.7 3.85° 0.50°
4 x 2 8,800 134.7 3.45° 0.50°
4 x 2 8,800 138.7 3.50° 0.50°
4 x 2 8,800 154.7 3.65° 0.50°
4 x 2 10,500 134.7 3.25° 0.50°
4 x 2 10,500 154.7 3.45° 0.50°
4 x 4 6,400 118.7 3.10 Not Set
4 x 4 6,400 134.7 3.25 Not Set
4 x 4 6,400/6,600 138.7 3.40 Not Set
4 x 4 6,400/6,600 154.7 3.55 Not Set
4 x 4 8,800 134.7 3.10 Not Set
4 x 4 8,800 138.7 3.15 Not Set
4 x 4 8,800 154.7 3.25 Not Set
4 x 4 10,500 134.7 2.90 Not Set
4 x 4 10,500 154.7 3.00 Not Set
CAB-CHASSIS VEHICLES
4 x 2 / 4 x 4 8,800 134.7 Caster Correction Measurement Not Set
*4 x 2 / 4 x 4 11,000 138.7 Not Set
*4 x 2 / 4 x 4 11,000 162.7 Not Set
Preferred Total Toe-In 0.10° (± 0.10°)
Preferred Cross Caster 0° (± 0.5°)
Preferred Cross Camber 0° (± 0.5°)
Thrust Angle 0° (± 0.4°)

NOTE: *4 x 2 11,000 GVW has a solid front axle with link/coil suspension system.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 04:59 PM
  #7  
34blazer's Avatar
34blazer
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo
Default

@stewie

does it pull at all? looks like .10*(1/16) toe in from the pic. thats what im shooting for to keep the scrub to a minimum. also, camber looks positive on the DS front?
 

Last edited by 34blazer; Apr 20, 2013 at 05:02 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 05:04 PM
  #8  
34blazer's Avatar
34blazer
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo
Default

Nice! Thank you!


[QUOTE=master tech;3004406]ALIGNMENT



4 x 2

GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT lbs.

WHEEL BASE inches

PREFERRED CASTER ± 1.00°

PREFERRED CAMBER ± 0.50°

4 x 2 6,010 118.7 3.40° 0.50°
4 x 2 6,400 118.7 3.40° 0.50°Preferred Total Toe-In 0.10° (± 0.10°)
Preferred Cross Caster 0° (± 0.5°)
Preferred Cross Camber 0° (± 0.5°)
Thrust Angle 0° (± 0.4°)

QUOTE]
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 06:28 PM
  #9  
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
Legend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 4
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by 34blazer
@stewie

does it pull at all? looks like .10*(1/16) toe in from the pic. thats what im shooting for to keep the scrub to a minimum. also, camber looks positive on the DS front?
There is a slight pull, but it's greatly improved. I'm happy.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2013 | 05:51 PM
  #10  
34blazer's Avatar
34blazer
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo
Default

BUMP.

On my last weekend I finally got around to the alignment. Holy ****! Royal Auto in Ohio really messed it up! Started with Caster and found the passenger side was set at 3.86*, couldve been more as I tried to get the truck as level as possible but probably didnt. Reset to 3.16. The camber was set to +0.5*, which I figured since nothing was touched after I marked the mounting points after ball joint replacment. Reset that to -0.1* per factory spec. Toe was horrible, 17/32" toe in on the passenger side, about the same(if not more) on the driverside, so about -1.70*. When turned to lock the inside of the tire was completley off the ground, no wonder the outside of the tires are severly scuffed. Since I used to haul tools/materials the camber went way more positive and pulled the toe way in. Brand new tires were out of balance, out of round after 10K miles. Reset toe to -0.10* or about 1/32". First test drive and no more pull to the left, steering feels way better too. Id recommend any DIY'er to perform or at least CHECK their alignment, its a little time consuming but worth it. Pleny of videos on youtube to watch.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.