2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Exhaust pipe size.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-26-2013 | 05:05 AM
MedicNathan's Avatar
MedicNathan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default Exhaust pipe size.

So I figure its about time I tackle the exhaust on my truck. But I've never done a custom exhaust setup and had a couple of questions.

I am planning on the pacesetter LTs and Y pipe. I just wasn't sure if I should stay with the 3" pipe the whole way back or use something smaller after the cat/ mufflers.
 
  #2  
Old 08-26-2013 | 06:03 AM
97tn4x4's Avatar
97tn4x4
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Default

Stock is 2.5 I believe, are you gonna run duals or just a single?
 
  #3  
Old 08-26-2013 | 07:05 AM
MedicNathan's Avatar
MedicNathan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

Planning on Single, cheaper and less work.
 
  #4  
Old 08-26-2013 | 08:00 AM
97tn4x4's Avatar
97tn4x4
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Default

You'll probably be good with a single 3" back. I've heard quite a few people running that and liked it.
 
  #5  
Old 08-26-2013 | 08:12 AM
DeeJayh's Avatar
DeeJayh
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

The headers are probably 1 and change inches port diameter. It depends how you want your truck to sound and what performance you want. 2.5 from the cat back will sound decent and give you excellent off the line power. A 3 cat back will be noticeably louder and give you better top end.
 
  #6  
Old 08-26-2013 | 01:18 PM
getdown78's Avatar
getdown78
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

2.5 in pipe is too big for true duals ! I would use 2.25 in pipe all the way back ! It will sound good and create enough back pressure so it flows even !
 
  #7  
Old 08-26-2013 | 01:33 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 82,859
Likes: 3,445
From: Clayton MI
Default

For a truck, 2.5 might be a little on the large side.... but, all that would result is a bit less bottom end torque. Bump to a 408 though, and I think it would be perfect.
 
  #8  
Old 08-26-2013 | 01:36 PM
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

Unless you're running 400 cubes or larger, 2.5 would be a tad too big.
 
  #9  
Old 08-26-2013 | 01:45 PM
merc225hp's Avatar
merc225hp
Champion
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 9
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by MedicNathan
Planning on Single, cheaper and less work.
3" to the cat then 2.5 for the rest of the single pipe system. 2.25 is max for a dual setup.
 
  #10  
Old 08-26-2013 | 11:55 PM
Spillage's Avatar
Spillage
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 68
From: S. Florida
Default

I'm interested in this also.

I've just done the intake side of my 5.2, and have Pacesetter LT's and Y-pipe (3") in the shed waiting for the rest of the exhaust system.

On my list is;
Magnaflow 99559HM 3" Cat (12" long)
Magnaflow 12279 3" Muffler (5"x8"x24" long)
These all sit further back than standard due to the LT's.

With a regular cab & short bed, this puts me close to the axle (about where the tailpipe starts).

It was the plan to continue with the Magnaflow 15035 3" tailpipe (pass side rear exit), with a 35107 4" Tip.
This by the way is the only Magnaflow pass side rear exit (my stock location) option for 3.9-5.9 magnums.
To go to 2.5" it is pass straight rear exit (not my location of preference).
The dual rear exit is also 2.5" off a 3in/2x2.5out muffler.

I did loose a little bottom end torque with my inlet mods, but am hoping to regain some with the headers and exhaust, to balance the out flow with the in... at some point I'll also do H&S1.7's.

So, whilst I've been told 3" all the way will be good choice (and that is what Magnaflow offers), I'm a little concerned about loosing more bottom end, rather than gaining some back.
At the moment, under 1600rpm is a little snoozeville, but by 2000rpm it comes to life.
Remember, I'm manual trans, so don't typically rev as hard working up the gears... 2000rpm is the regular driving shift rpm.
 

Last edited by Spillage; 08-26-2013 at 11:59 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 PM.