2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Leaking transmission line, should I do the delete check valve mod?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 02:23 PM
  #1  
reconrey's Avatar
reconrey
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default Leaking transmission line, should I do the delete check valve mod?

Well, I have developed a minor drip on my transmission line, not sure if it is from the connection or the line itself, and I am looking to fix it. I really see two available options, do the check valve delete mod and replace the whole section of hose, or buy a line online and just replace it. It looks like doing both methods will end up costing the same, ~$25.

Also, the line that I found online is the Dorman 624-305, which on the Dorman site lists it as compatible with 97-01, but it looks like I can just pull the section off that goes to the radiator and replace it.

Would it be wiser to just replace the line, or build the custom line?

Also, I was reading that you can just drill the check valve out, would that be a wise option if I buy the Dorman line?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
Ham Bone's Avatar
Ham Bone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 7
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

Your best bet for transmission longevity is to delete the check valve and a large trans cooler to the package.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #3  
reconrey's Avatar
reconrey
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default

It would probably be easier if I built the line to add a trans cooler/remote filter to the mix, correct?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 02:41 PM
  #4  
Ham Bone's Avatar
Ham Bone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 7
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

When youre working with generic (not application specific parts) then it normally is
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:06 PM
  #5  
reconrey's Avatar
reconrey
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default

How much of a longevity increase will a trans cooler provide? Also, isn't there already a trans cooler sandwiched between the radiator and AC condenser?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:09 PM
  #6  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,465
Likes: 4,220
From: Clayton MI
Default

On trucks with the heavy duty, plow, or towing package, yep, there is an aux cooler in there, and adding another one is just kinda redundant. Now, adding an external, in-line filter, that also incorporates a check valve, is a rather good idea. Not only does it give you an easily replaceable check valve/filter, you also get a bit more fluid volume to boot.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:11 PM
  #7  
Ham Bone's Avatar
Ham Bone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 7
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

Unless you have that tow pack like hey you said I thought they only came with little itty bitty cooler.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:15 PM
  #8  
reconrey's Avatar
reconrey
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default

How exactly does adding an external filter increase the flow? Is is just removing the stock check valve that gives the increase in flow?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,465
Likes: 4,220
From: Clayton MI
Default

The external cooler just increases cooling. It actually slightly reduces flow...... but, not nearly so much as a clogged up check valve will. (wave bye-bye to the nice transmission.....) If you tow/haul at all with your truck, having the additional cooling is a REALLY good idea.

Opps, external filter doesn't increase flow either. Its the elimination of the check valve that is the end goal here. Of course, the check valve is in there to prevent the torque converter from draining down, and causing a delay before actually going into gear the first start of the day. (a few seconds at most.....)
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2016 | 03:59 PM
  #10  
reconrey's Avatar
reconrey
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default

I do have the towing package, so there is that aux cooler in there, but I don't do too much towing/hauling, so I don't think that I need to add and additional cooler to the loop. However, I would like to add a remote filter. Is it entirely necessary to re-introduce a check valve when adding a remote filter, or could I just live with waiting a few seconds before I take off (which I kind of already try to do)?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.