2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Throttle Body Upgrade Confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-18-2017, 01:27 PM
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Skeptic68W is offline
Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default Throttle Body Upgrade Confusion

So I've been researching some performance upgrades for my 5.9 and a common one seems to be 52mm throttle bodies.

What is confusing to me though, is how can people report an increase in performance when the stock throttle body flows 635cfm(source: hughes) but the stock intake manifold only flows 180cfm(source: allpar intake shootout) and the stock heads only flow 199cfm (source: mopar action magazine)?
 
  #2  
Old 06-18-2017, 01:32 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is online now
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 82,527
Likes: 0
Received 3,390 Likes on 3,130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Skeptic68W
So I've been researching some performance upgrades for my 5.9 and a common one seems to be 52mm throttle bodies.

What is confusing to me though, is how can people report an increase in performance when the stock throttle body flows 635cfm(source: hughes) but the stock intake manifold only flows 180cfm(source: allpar intake shootout) and the stock heads only flow 199cfm (source: mopar action magazine)?
Throttle body is total flow, Manifold, and head flow is for ONE cylinder/runner.

Consider, the engine is just a giant air pump. It 'displaces' 360 cubic inches of air per two revolutions. So, about .21 cubic feet. Figure a redline of 5500 RPM, and that works out to max flow of 577.5 CFM. Well below what the 52mm throttle body supplies.

Of course, that's figuring 100% volumetric efficiency, which these engines don't even come close to. I think if you get 75-80%, you are doing really well.
 
  #3  
Old 06-18-2017, 10:22 PM
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Skeptic68W is offline
Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Throttle body is total flow, Manifold, and head flow is for ONE cylinder/runner.

Consider, the engine is just a giant air pump. It 'displaces' 360 cubic inches of air per two revolutions. So, about .21 cubic feet. Figure a redline of 5500 RPM, and that works out to max flow of 577.5 CFM. Well below what the 52mm throttle body supplies.

Of course, that's figuring 100% volumetric efficiency, which these engines don't even come close to. I think if you get 75-80%, you are doing really well.
O ok, I never thought about the cfm ratings of the manifold and heads being for one cylinder. Thanks for that.

With your calculation though, wouldn't the stock throttle body be more than sufficient and thus upgrades wouldn't provide any performance advantage?
 
  #4  
Old 06-18-2017, 10:40 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is online now
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 82,527
Likes: 0
Received 3,390 Likes on 3,130 Posts
Default

You don't get any more horsepower really, but, you do get better throttle response.
 
  #5  
Old 06-19-2017, 06:46 AM
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Skeptic68W is offline
Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I could see that, for equal throttle pedal movement you're letting in more air.
 
  #6  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:17 AM
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Ramman18 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,103
Received 108 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

I've been debating getting a 50mm for my 5.2 for years. Just can't get convinced that $250 will be worth it.
 
  #7  
Old 06-19-2017, 01:08 PM
Adobedude's Avatar
Adobedude
Adobedude is offline
All Star
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corrales, New Mecico
Posts: 907
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ramman18
I've been debating getting a 50mm for my 5.2 for years. Just can't get convinced that $250 will be worth it.
It won't be....
 
  #8  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:20 PM
dbbd1's Avatar
dbbd1
dbbd1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

But it will help (slightly) if you remove your TB, round-off (radius or blending) the incoming edge and polish the throat up a bit.


And, its free!
 
  #9  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:12 PM
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Ugly1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,123
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

250 seems way too much to spend. It seemed a little more able to rev, maybe.

What happened to dakrt?? he used to sell the ported ones on ebay for 100 bucks. That was a bit more tolerable.

There is a guy selling some on ebay for 200. Still a bit high if you asked me.
 

Last edited by Ugly1; 06-19-2017 at 11:17 PM.
  #10  
Old 06-20-2017, 12:22 AM
adukart's Avatar
adukart
adukart is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,315
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I loved my 52mm but it also was on top of a hughes airgap.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.