2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

fabtech vs skyjacker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #1  
mopar 1's Avatar
mopar 1
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From:
Default fabtech vs skyjacker

I want to lift my 98 dodge ram 1500 4x4 5.2 longbed 5-6 inches and was wondering which was the better lift out of these two brands. I know i want to lift the rear of the truck with leaf springs instead of the block method. I know that the fabtech includes the shocks while the skyjacker doesnt. Which is the best bang for the buck. Take into consideration that this is a daily driver to. any info on the subject will be greatly appreciated


Also how do you put you picture on your profile
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #2  
Tani1500's Avatar
Tani1500
Champion
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
From: Wyckoff, NJ
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

skyjacker!!!!! dont even think about getting sh*ttech! they suck and there lifts are crappy as hell. the only think fabtechs make a good lift for is a jeep.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 01:07 AM
  #3  
The Burning Rom's Avatar
The Burning Rom
Record Breaker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

Skyjacker
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 02:50 AM
  #4  
4DrMopar's Avatar
4DrMopar
Captain
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

Fabtech makes damn nice lifts, Skyjacker has nice initial quality,but springs sag quickly.... RUMOR has it the springs have a lifetiem sagging warranty with proof of purchase...
I actually kinda like the Superlift 5-6" kit. I have the rough country 3" and love it, the 5 is even nicer..

 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 05:04 AM
  #5  
arkansasmp's Avatar
arkansasmp
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

i am running the skyjacker 5 inch and love it. ive had the fabtech 6 inch on my truck and it sucked complete a#@. i knowplenty of guys that run SJ lifts and have never had any sagging issues. If you take cars of your truck and dont just absolutely abuse the crap out of it you will love the SJ lift. Right now im running the 5 inch with 35 Super swamper SSRs, MT classic locks and 4.56 gear ratio and i never have a single problem out of it. Fabtech lifts are good for Jeeps and chevys but thats it.


---David

you can ask 01classicram on here he has seen my truck in person he can tell you how it looks.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
4DrMopar's Avatar
4DrMopar
Captain
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

Ok, I keep hearing Fabtech sucks, but no one can tell me why.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #7  
zeekxxx's Avatar
zeekxxx
Captain
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

Hmmm

I have no idea why people are slamming fabtech but skyjacker is the way I will go in the future. I dont like the powder coated blue look of the fabtech parts. Although I have a blue truck Im not a fan of blue liftkit parts. Yes I can repaint them but I'd be too excited and bolt it on right away. As for a lift Im going for the 5 inch lift next summer. I already braced myself to regear the front and rear ends. I also braced myself to buy a little beater accord as my daily driver to work. Its sad but with the 10mpg I'll be getting the dodge will now be my weekend and foul weather driver. Im very intrested in making a sweet truck but with rising fuel prices (which are going down thank-god) you really have to think long and hard when you do something to your truck that makes MPG worse.

 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #8  
4DrMopar's Avatar
4DrMopar
Captain
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

They come in black too Actually, I get 10 mpg NOW with 33's and a 3" kit, but fully plan to do gears, tires and taller springs for the 5"....
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 12:27 PM
  #9  
zeekxxx's Avatar
zeekxxx
Captain
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

I think if I am correct you can get your mpg back to 13-15 if you go with the 4.10 gears with your current tire size.

Seems like 3.55's with 33's cause you to fall out of your powerband a tad. I think a few members in here are running 33's with 4.10's Maybe its 4.11 but Im sure you get the point.


 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 04:06 AM
  #10  
Ramboy08's Avatar
Ramboy08
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: fabtech vs skyjacker

i had a 99 dodge 5.9L with 3.55 and 33in. tall tires and my truck down shifts on ever single hill in the state of texas i just bought 4.10 gears and it doesnt down shift near as much as it used to and i got 3 mpg more.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.