2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

99 2500 handling problems-different??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 11-19-2006, 11:02 PM
dr_destruction's Avatar
dr_destruction
dr_destruction is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Tires only have 1500 miles on them and when the aligment was done they double checked the balance too. And, in fact one of the weights had fallen off from the when the tires were purchased. Wasnt enought to make a difference though. Thanks for all the help here, I appreciate all the responses. I see some posts t that talk about "max caster" . Does anyone know what that is? Is it 4.5 or 5 degrees?
 
  #12  
Old 11-19-2006, 11:24 PM
dr_destruction's Avatar
dr_destruction
dr_destruction is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Just throwing this out there too. The new tires that were put on by the previous owner the week before I bought the truck are a "p" series tire. I was told that I should have a "d" series on there. Would the softer sidewalls on the"p" series cause any of the problems?
 
  #13  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:02 PM
TMS Bill's Avatar
TMS Bill
TMS Bill is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Max caster is whatever adjustment your particular truck will allow. You adjust so the lower control arms are pulled all the way to the rear.

About "P" vs. "D" rating ... I think whoever you were talking to was confusing P-metric construction and the tire's load range. Tires for our trucks are either P-metric or LT. The load range is "C" or "D" or whatever ... read here: http://www.moderntiredealer.com/t_in...t&storyID=1162
 
  #14  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:20 PM
Ramdit's Avatar
Ramdit
Ramdit is offline
Amateur
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

The only things that I have seen is the incorrect trac bar installed, or the hole for the bushing side of the trac bar was worn into an oval shape, allowing the front axle to move side to side with steering input. There are two different size ball ends to the bar. The nut will tighten up on the smaller one but allow play. Did you check for front end play while someone was moving the steering wheel back and forth yet? JUst a guess.
 
  #15  
Old 11-20-2006, 10:57 PM
dr_destruction's Avatar
dr_destruction
dr_destruction is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Yes, I just spent half the afternoon under the truck looking at stuff. Everything looks tight with no slop, including the track bar. The upper and lower ball joints on both sides along with the track bar were replaced 2 weeks ago.

Question: With the front wheels off the ground and the engine running, should the steering center itself after turning it from one side or another. Mine will not. If you turn all the way to the right, it stays there if you let go of the wheel. This is with no wieght on the front wheels. So, does the caster in the fron axle cause the wheels to center or should the steering box be self-centering? The only thing undert the front end that has not been replaced is the "center-link" or "drag link". It appears to be fine tough, no movement when the wheel is turned side-to side. I'm assuming that this is a one-piece design and the ball joints are not replaceable? The Steering box is a "rebuilt" unit that appears to be new. The previous owner said he replaced it a couple months ago. So I'm hoping that its OK. At this point there isnt much left to suspect.
 
  #16  
Old 11-20-2006, 11:06 PM
mopar98's Avatar
mopar98
mopar98 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: united states
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Is there a chance that there is caliper hanging up.
 
  #17  
Old 11-21-2006, 03:39 AM
Scottr1110's Avatar
Scottr1110
Scottr1110 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Westmont IL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

caster does create return ablitly p metric tires are tires that are on cars and lts are what bigger trucks have did u check for play in the shaft from the steering box to the steering wheel more caster should make the wheels return i cant see really anything eles that would cause it to do that
 
  #18  
Old 11-21-2006, 07:24 PM
dr_destruction's Avatar
dr_destruction
dr_destruction is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

I tried adjusting the steering box, about 1/8 of a turn in. This seemed to make the problem worse. Even harder to keep tracking staight. It does not seem like a "slop" problem, but more of a binding or mis0aligment problem. The only questionable ball joints are in the center link, and I'm not detecting much movement at all there. How much is too much? I'm guessing that any movement is too much. It does seem, however, that if I hold the center link with both hands and try to rotate it in the ball joints, that it will not move. It almost seems like its too stiff. The shaft coming off the pitman arm and going doen to the centerlink can be rotated slighty and seems to be a lot more free. Could this be a problem?
 
  #19  
Old 11-21-2006, 09:02 PM
TMS Bill's Avatar
TMS Bill
TMS Bill is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Again ... try adjusting the steering box OUT ... it sounds like it's too tight. You made it tighter. Undo the 1/8th turn and then go another 1/8th. See if that helps.
 
  #20  
Old 11-22-2006, 12:06 AM
dr_destruction's Avatar
dr_destruction
dr_destruction is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 99 2500 handling problems-different??

Sorry, TMS BILL, I guess I didnt mention that I moved it each direction and drove it afterwards. Loosening only added slop. Tightening made the truck seem "darty".
 


Quick Reply: 99 2500 handling problems-different??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 PM.