3rd Gen Dakota general discussion This section is for general discussions about your 3rd gen Dakota. Non tech related Dakota threads belong here.

4th Gen Dakota Coverage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2019 | 07:23 PM
  #1  
EliteTempleton's Avatar
EliteTempleton
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default 4th Gen Dakota Coverage

Looks like a 4th Gen Ram Dakota is all but certain, especially when it's talked about at shareholder meetings!

News straight out of Detroit:
https://amp.freep.com/amp/1151441001

Might even be built in the United States!
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2019 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
Jaded's Avatar
Jaded
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 21
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Last I saw they were backing off. FCA said buyers who want a midsize can buy the Ram classic for the same price of a midsize.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 09:04 AM
  #3  
northgator8's Avatar
northgator8
All Star
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 759
Likes: 18
From: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Jaded
Last I saw they were backing off. FCA said buyers who want a midsize can buy the Ram classic for the same price of a midsize.
But it won't fit in my driveway . . . .
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2019 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
Jaded's Avatar
Jaded
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 21
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Originally Posted by northgator8
But it won't fit in my driveway . . . .
2019 Ram 1500 classic - 209″ L x 79.4″ W x 74.6″ H
2005 Dodge Dakota quad cab 218.8″ L x 71.7″ W x 68.6″ H


The Dakota is longer, only 8" less width, and 6" shorter? Is the internet lying to me?
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 07:01 AM
  #5  
northgator8's Avatar
northgator8
All Star
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 759
Likes: 18
From: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Jaded
2019 Ram 1500 classic - 209″ L x 79.4″ W x 74.6″ H
2005 Dodge Dakota quad cab 218.8″ L x 71.7″ W x 68.6″ H


The Dakota is longer, only 8" less width, and 6" shorter? Is the internet lying to me?
It is the width that is my problem. My neighbour and I share a driveway between our houses. A full-sized truck just makes it too tight.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 07:37 AM
  #6  
ZEN357's Avatar
ZEN357
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 408
Likes: 6
Default

If this is it, it looks terrible....

https://www.autotrader.com/car-news/...-mexico-258028
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 12:00 PM
  #7  
dakotaff's Avatar
dakotaff
Champion
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 91
From: Jersey
Default

Rumors have a new Ram 1200 ( Fiat Fullback ) coming in 2021-22. Whether it's called a Ram 1200 or Dakota is anyone's guess, if it even comes to the US at all.

The Fiat Fullback is a pickup truck that was developed between Fiat and Mitsubishi a few years ago, the truck is identical to the fifth generation of the Mitsubishi L200. The engines available are a 2.4 Diesel, a 2.5 Diesel, and a 2.4 Gasoline as of now. I assume that the next Gen of this truck is what we might see here in the good old USA.

Who knows, maybe we'll see the Dakota and it's twin, the Mitsubishi Raider, both appear once again.

Ram 1200
LpavYUc.jpg

I think that truck shown in the Autotrader article in the above post is the smaller Fiat Strada truck.
 

Last edited by dakotaff; May 16, 2019 at 12:15 PM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 02:25 PM
  #8  
David Kalinowski's Avatar
David Kalinowski
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 98
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Jaded
2019 Ram 1500 classic - 209″ L x 79.4″ W x 74.6″ H
2005 Dodge Dakota quad cab 218.8″ L x 71.7″ W x 68.6″ H


The Dakota is longer, only 8" less width, and 6" shorter? Is the internet lying to me?
nope. I had the same realization when I was looking at a 2005 silverado. It was litteraly just wider, to make the bed a 4ft wide between the wheel wells. Other than that the 3rd gen dakota might as well have been a full size truck.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2019 | 08:45 AM
  #9  
Jaded's Avatar
Jaded
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 21
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Originally Posted by David Kalinowski
nope. I had the same realization when I was looking at a 2005 silverado. It was litteraly just wider, to make the bed a 4ft wide between the wheel wells. Other than that the 3rd gen dakota might as well have been a full size truck.
lol, all to get that sheet of plywood. Anyway, I'm someone who would buy the 1500 for the same money.(if I had money) Dakota barley makes it into my carport, something a little shorter would be nice.

I don't see much point in a rebadged Gladiator, so we'll see what/if they do.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2019 | 10:47 AM
  #10  
rodslinger's Avatar
rodslinger
Veteran
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 27
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Jaded
2019 Ram 1500 classic - 209″ L x 79.4″ W x 74.6″ H
2005 Dodge Dakota quad cab 218.8″ L x 71.7″ W x 68.6″ H


The Dakota is longer, only 8" less width, and 6" shorter? Is the internet lying to me?
The internet is lying to you. That 209" Ram Classic is a short bed, regular cab. A quad cab is going to be about 238". That's a LOT longer than the Dakota.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.