3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Boosting question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #21  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

I'd have to get rid of my catalytic converters though, wouldn't I?

So let me try and get this straight...

...you run two pipes into one turbo inlet, and then piping from there down, and then I could split the exhaust there, into my two mufflers?

Or would I be best just running single exhuast?
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #22  
baracis's Avatar
baracis
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

What happened to your left eye?
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #23  
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default

All modern turbo gas cars still have cats. You will have to keep them to pass emission, if required.

Based on no experience...just a mechanical engineering degree, I'd approach it like this -

I would make the manifolds and "up-pipes" as absolutely symmetrical as possible. If one has to be longer and one shorter, make them both longer. Bring them together into a symmetrical, restriction free Y-joint, and feed it into the turbo.

Then onto the cats...you'd probably be fine reusing the stockers. Can anyone chime in on whether damage arise in the tuning process, or due to poor tuning? Maybe a pair of quality high-flow cats?

After the cats, pretty much whatever you want...probably with as little restriction is possible.

I gotta say, for an application like this, I would go remote mount all the way. But it's your truck. It would be something to see for sure.

I'd bet you will pay several hundo per manifold. And someone who really knows what they are doing better lay them out. I would not start a project like this without a CAD model...too much to go wrong without a ******* fitup! I'm no Jesse James. 3D CAD can do excellent piping layouts, and even break it up into individual pieces after you've got it laid out.

**Edit** And yeah...$20,000? Left eye?
 

Last edited by cramerica; Aug 25, 2009 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #24  
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default

v-i-r-t-u-a-l is a censored word? what?
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:38 PM
  #25  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

I got hit in the face with a golf club when I was 6 years old...
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #26  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

As for the catalytics...

Since I'm gonna be only running one pipe from the turbo back, can I just use one cat?
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #27  
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default

I would think a single cat might not give the exhaust enough transit time and surface area to effectively remove all unburned hydrocarbons. Maybe a single large, high flow, high performance cat would do the job. But it might be trial-and-error when you get inspected.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #28  
baracis's Avatar
baracis
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Frenchy
I got hit in the face with a golf club when I was 6 years old...
Ouch!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #29  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

I have no inspections
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 07:47 PM
  #30  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

I doubt you're going to be able to fit a turbo above the engine, a turbo is a lot bigger around than a blower is tall.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.