3rd Gen Durango 2011+ models

"Wagoneer vs Durango vs Caravan"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 09:28 AM
  #1  
Crew Member's Avatar
Crew Member
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default "Wagoneer vs Durango vs Caravan"

More speculation on the fate of the Durango:

http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php...ngo-vs-caravan

Really, I don't know why the Durango can't live on as currently positioned, as well as the Grand Cherokee. Make the Wagoneer the "Cadillac" version of the Durango. And this talk of a new Dodge crossover to replace the Caravan, I don't get that at all.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 10:11 AM
  #2  
IlliniJeeper's Avatar
IlliniJeeper
Rookie
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Default

God that rendering of the Wagoneer is FUGLY.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
hairless_ape's Avatar
hairless_ape
Rookie
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Wow, baseless speculation. I can't believe someone got paid to write that garbage.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
FSTDANGO3's Avatar
FSTDANGO3
Champion
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: NORTH JERSEY
Default

Originally Posted by hairless_ape
Wow, baseless speculation. I can't believe someone got paid to write that garbage.
I agree
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
Orin500XL's Avatar
Orin500XL
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 602
Likes: 1
From: Arnold, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by IlliniJeeper
God that rendering of the Wagoneer is FUGLY.
+1

A Jeep "Woodie"? I get it, but not with woodgrain applique.

What I don't understand about the styling is that Jeep is positioned to be rugged, backwoodsy, outdoorsy, haul everything SUV but then they make the nose small and presumably more aerodynamic. I don't need aerodynamics in the boonies. I need torque, 4WD, heavy duty suspension, gunracks, bush guards, Baja lights, and an area to strap dead animals and camping gear. Oh, wait, that's what Jeep used to be. Now, not so much.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 05:05 PM
  #6  
CMil527's Avatar
CMil527
Champion
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 1
From: Old Bridge,NJ
Default

Lol ohh boy...
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #7  
fishandgrits's Avatar
fishandgrits
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

That's almost as ugly as the previous generation Durango! lol
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #8  
Fullslp's Avatar
Fullslp
Captain
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Default

Holy crap! I know inspiration is a must have for an artist but smoking pot Is obviously not working... The wagoneer would never have that front end. The drag co. Would be off the charts. It's all about MPG and if the mopar boys can spend millions on design and create fuel saving dodads like MDS, radiator shutters and factory airbags to get the MPG up they are not going to let the design team flush those gains down the drain. God that's ugly. My 2
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 08:53 PM
  #9  
WannaV-8's Avatar
WannaV-8
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Default

I read the article and it seems that the Durango will stick around-especially if the Wagoneer is THAT ugly. They're just speculating. I also read their review on the Durango and it really does well. All the things we love. I'll be upset if it does go away. First vehicle in a long time that I really love.
 

Last edited by WannaV-8; Oct 18, 2013 at 09:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 09:43 AM
  #10  
Crew Member's Avatar
Crew Member
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Fullslp
... The wagoneer would never have that front end.
Probably the same thing they said about the Cherokee when the first artists renderings came out. And yet... look what we ended up with.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.