3rd Gen RAM general discussion/NON-tech This section is for general discussions about your 3rd gen RAM. Non tech related RAM threads belong here.

Octane...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 12:17 PM
  #1  
Gt001122's Avatar
Gt001122
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default Octane...?

Have an 03 Hemi and since gas has gone thru the roof, I just made the move to Regular Unleaded for the first time. Been on 93 since first drove it home and have been on 89 Mid but finally had to give in. Manual says Mid grade but prices are killing me. Talked to other on driving on 87 and say so far so good. Any long term Ill effects on the Hemi? I will switch back if ever the prices go down again. Any commemts would be appreciated, Thanks
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #2  
ALLDATAdiyINFO's Avatar
ALLDATAdiyINFO
Former Vendor
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Default

Does it 'Ping' at all on the 87?

If not you will be fine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #3  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Do a search, it's pretty much been determined that almost all who have had a cylinder go on them have admitted to running 87 octane gas over a steady period of time.

Not saying that EVERYONE who runs 87 octane gas will experience a major engine failure, but that most who do, are running low octane fuel.

Pre-detonation over a period of time is a very bad thing. Problem is, there could be pre-detonation going on and you don't realize it. Pinging and knocking are sure signs, but not always real detectable. Your choice, pay the $4-5 bucks more per fill-up or increase your risk of paying thousands on an engine rebuild later.

There is no reason or advantage to running 91+ octane on a stock tuned truck, but you should be running 89.

The only way I would consider running 87 octane fuel is if I used a tuner with a tune on it that retarded timing, like the 87 octane and fuel saver tunes on a Superchips...
 

Last edited by HammerZ71; Apr 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 02:41 PM
  #4  
Marx's Avatar
Marx
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 1
From: Ontario Canada
Default

what he siad ^^^
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #5  
SHAGPOWER's Avatar
SHAGPOWER
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

You're definitely going to experience problems over time with pre-detonation damage. It's 89 octane for a reason, and a reason I would never buy a used vehicle made to run on premium only..because you know people aren't doing it..Gas prices aren't that bad yet.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 04:46 PM
  #6  
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1
Site Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,657
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

Yep, It's worth the whole $2.60 a tank full difference in price to keep the engine from destroying it self over time. I would never use 87 in mine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 07:09 AM
  #7  
NHHEMI's Avatar
NHHEMI
Professional
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

These threads always make me laugh. Dodge tells you to use 89 for optimum performance but it is not mandatory. They tell you as well that 87 is perfectly fine to use. If you are not towing or constantly flooring it all the time 87 is perfectly fine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 11:45 AM
  #8  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Originally Posted by NHHEMI
These threads always make me laugh. Dodge tells you to use 89 for optimum performance but it is not mandatory. They tell you as well that 87 is perfectly fine to use. If you are not towing or constantly flooring it all the time 87 is perfectly fine.

Dodge will also tell you there are no known issues with dash materials, C-Clips, rear pinions, rack & pinions, etc.

Big sales advantage telling you "well you should really use 89 octane, but you can get by with 87".

Normally, any engine with a compression ratio over 9:1 will require a use of 89 octane fuel and when you hit about 10:1, you are talking nothing but premium. The Hemi has 9.6:1 ratio.

The reason they can get away with the "recommend 89, but 87 is ok" with a compression ratio this high is because of the EGR system. ('03s have no EGR and it's a big reason we see so many more people on these forums looking to replace blown '03s and not so much '04s, if they've been running 87 octane).

The primary purpose of the EGR is emissions and reducing the amount of NOX that is released into the environment, but a secondary benefit is that the gas dilutes the A/F mix slightly, which in turn lowers combustion temperatures and helps to prevent pre-ignition in the cylinders and thus lowers the octane requirement of the engine slightly.

HOWEVER, if you have a loss of EGR, which is VERY common either because the valve is dirty, non-functioning or ANY loss of vacuum is present then this cooling effect is completely lost and pre-ignition/pre-detonation WILL occur with 87 octane by virtue of this engines compression ratio. And remember, you usually won't generate an EGR code unless the unit has completely failed.

Again, I personally know people who have Hemi Rams and run nothing but 87 octane who have yet to have a major engine issue, BUT it significantly increases the risk of a major failure IMO. True, someone who uses nothing but 89 may drop a valve tomorrow with 50k on it while a guy who runs nothing but 87 may have 150k on his and it still runs, BUT the odds are WAY in favor of the engine running 89 having a long life...
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,168
Likes: 23
From: South GA
Default

Originally Posted by lxman1
Yep, It's worth the whole $2.60 a tank full difference in price to keep the engine from destroying it self over time. I would never use 87 in mine.
Agreed, 0.10 cent different usually from one octane level to the next so 0.10 times 26 gallons is only 2.60 (89) a tank or 5.20 (93)

Surely you can to do and keep the engine happy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #10  
Gt001122's Avatar
Gt001122
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

Thanks Guys, all info was great. Going from 93 to 89 did make it run okay but lacked in get up and go. Now having 87 in the tank I sure have been taking it easy but I do pull a trailer so I just went back to 93 just to play it safe...
Thanks again..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.