3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Little experiment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #1  
ray97's Avatar
ray97
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Yuma, Az.
Default Little experiment

Well I drove to Phoenix today from Yuma which is almost a 200 mile trip oneway to catch my D. Lions while they were in town(and Lost). But this morning before I left I switched my sc tuner to the economy/stock mode to see if I would get any better MPG... on the way there I got about 14.8. Then on the way back I switched it back to the performance mode and I got about 14.6. I really could tell a difference between the two (performane wise) also and with that little of a difference I will be keeping the performance setting. I did the calc. by hand also before anybody asks. I was running about 80 mph and my tach was at 2250-2300 just about the entire way.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
Max Power's Avatar
Max Power
Professional
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: St. Paul, MN
Default RE: Little experiment

It isn't the small differemce in MPG that gets me, it's the 20 cents more per gallon for premium.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #3  
ray97's Avatar
ray97
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Yuma, Az.
Default RE: Little experiment

I'm already running midgrade anyway so it is only about 10 cents.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #4  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default RE: Little experiment

ORIGINAL: ray97

Well I drove to Phoenix today from Yuma which is almost a 200 mile trip oneway to catch my D. Lions while they were in town(and Lost).
Negative 18 yards rushing! What's up with that?
Crazy year ain't it? Teams look great one week and can't do anything right the next week. You take New England and maybe 2 or 3 other teams out of the picture and you have complete parity. No clue who can beat who on a given Sunday.

Oh, and about the SC Tuner, I actually clocked it on a couple of trips to my GA. farm last year (a shade under 300 miles each way) and early this spring. I got .2 mpg's better with the economy once and .1 mpg's better with the performance once. So, mine stays on performance all the time. This was running 93 octane gas in both settings.

BTW - I also clocked the 87 economy tune with 87 octane on one trip and got 1.7 mpg worse! So it really doesn't save you anything by not putting 91/93 octane in the truck.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #5  
ray97's Avatar
ray97
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Yuma, Az.
Default RE: Little experiment

I'm with you HammerZ I could not believe they lost and this was my first pro game ever attending and this is what happened!!! I think I will stay at home next year and save some money. Anyway I did have fun and it was a nice drive in my truck. It really performs well on the road, not as smooth as my wife's Tahoe but still really nice for a truck. Wouldn't trade it for nothing.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #6  
tdmopar59's Avatar
tdmopar59
Grand Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 0
From: Warminster, PA
Default RE: Little experiment

i always have my chip on performance.... ill be calculating the "gas mileage" when i get run lower... i only used a half a tank so far...
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #7  
truckin151's Avatar
truckin151
Grand Champion
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,041
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, Arizona
Default RE: Little experiment

You know I have ran both the performance tune and the econo tune in my truck and I got to say I prefer the econo tune over the performance tune. From what I have seen the perfomance tune is really works great for the upper rpms and puts me at 14.9mpg but the low rpm rang feels like the stock. On the other hand with the econo tune (running 89 octane) gives me much better performance in the lower rpm range than the performance setting but lacks slightly in the upper rpm range and give me 15.1mpg.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #8  
HuntinHanson's Avatar
HuntinHanson
Champion
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default RE: Little experiment

When i had my tuner i was getting about 18 mpg on both performance and ecomony mode
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.