3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

Old Feb 17, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #1  
Buford445's Avatar
Buford445
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: City MI
Default 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

Looking to buy newer 2500 to pull my 25 ft 5th Wheel , doe anybody pull one with 5.7 hemi , and what kind of mileage do you get with and w/out trialer
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
JD1500's Avatar
JD1500
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

ive pulled a smaller trailer, about 20ft, and a 8k pd horse trailer. I get 12-15 in town and 15-17.5 hiighway unloaded. 9-10 in town and 10-11 higway pulling trailers. Your 2500 with a hemi will show the same.

IMO if you pull that traler a lot, get the cummins. Pulling a lot with make up for the 4k dollar difference in cost, just in fuel
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
JimmyDiablo's Avatar
JimmyDiablo
Champion
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,360
Likes: 0
From: Tolleson, Az
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

Definately go with the diesel. the hemi is a great motor, but it will never pull like a Cummins.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #4  
RamItOne's Avatar
RamItOne
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,393
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

No question ctd all the way. Even if you buy an older ctd for the same price as a new hemi the ctd will last longer and since you tow youll regret getting the hemi, even if you regear it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:31 AM
  #5  
HankL's Avatar
HankL
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 8
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

repost
----

There is no arguing that both Dodge and Cummins know how to make a truck
that gets good MPG...the model year 1998 Cummins Ram proves that....
but the US EPA won't let them build that pickup anymore.

Consumer's Reports tests of all the diesel heavy duty pickups show substantially reduced fuel economy:
====
old post:
====
The September 2007 issue of Consumer Reports arrived
and has an article on page 52 reviewing full size pickups
with most written on 1500 models
but they did test 3/4 ton diesels from Dodge, GM and Ford
and had all gasoline and diesel pickups tow the same 7400 lb trailer.

High Points:
Consumers Reports says that the reliability of the Ram has now
improved enough that they make it a 'recommended' pick.

Low points:
The new diesels with the new emissions and ULSD fuel
all showed quite low MPG in 'mixed' driving and towing the 7400 lb trailer:

Ford 250 6.4L........10 MPG mixed....8.7 MPG towing
GM 6.6 Duramax....13 MPG mixed...10.4 MPG towing

Dodge 6.7. diesel...13 MPG mixed...10 MPG towing

Dodge 5.7gas........13 MPG mixed....8.2 MPG towing

The Toyota Tundra 5.7 was 15 MPG mixed and 8.4 towing
and pulled the 7400 lb trailer to 60 mph in 16.1 seconds
versus 18.9 seconds for the Ford Powerstroke
versus same 18.9 seconds for Dodge 6.7 Cummins
and 17.0 seconds for the Chevy Duramax.

Consumer Reports writes that they dislike the ride of the Tundra
and prefer the ride of the new Silverado.

The Dodge Ram matched the Tundra on dry braking from 60 mph
with 153 feet for each. It is good to see Ram brakes up to snuff finally.

sample quote:

"The Dodge Ram 1500 has improved since the last time we tested it in 2004.
It rides and handles better, and it is quieter."

This issue of Consumers Reports has
"Stop ID thieves"
on a blue cover
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
XxSilentHawk99xX's Avatar
XxSilentHawk99xX
Captain
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

CTD is better for towing anyday
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #7  
cyclone429's Avatar
cyclone429
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 2
From: Alberta
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd


yes the ctd is better, but it's expensive over kill if your towing under 11,000 pounds, I tow a lot with my reg cab 2500 5.7 6sp with a 373 ltd slip, it dose the job quite well,and with the cost of disel flue more than gas, I doubt thiers a saving.

If your into a quad or mega cab with a real 8 ft box, the hemi will eat you out of house and home and will not tow as good as a reg cab, empty booth the hemi and ctdare dam close in mpg.

With a 25 foot prowler tandom axel ( bumper hitch ) I have no problems on hills at 60 mphbut I do use almost twice the flue as empty say 12 mpg, empty I'm close to 18 to 19 mpg.

I have added dual ex, mopar CAI and my truck has atopper
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #8  
Buford445's Avatar
Buford445
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: City MI
Default RE: 2500 5.7 hemi vrs 5.9 ctd

I would like to thank everyone for there reply's , You have most likley cost me a lot of money!!! as I will be buying a Diesel thank every one agian
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.