3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

87 vs 89 in a Hemi

Old Jul 31, 2009 | 01:47 AM
  #11  
JoshGotaHemi's Avatar
JoshGotaHemi
Rookie
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Redone4x4
yep, i agree. does it seem faster right after you wash it also?

of course it does, it's lighter!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #12  
Ice-Forever's Avatar
Ice-Forever
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by JoshGotaHemi
of course it does, it's lighter!!
Um, I'm glad someone else knew.


Nothin to speed up Bonnie like removing all the extra dirt and grime weight...
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #13  
dunerider650's Avatar
dunerider650
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

i know when i run 87 octane in my bike its faster than running 91 because 87 detonates easier.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #14  
dunerider650's Avatar
dunerider650
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

run the lowest grade fuel you can before you get pre-detonation is how we look at it for bikes....but with trucks the added octane gives you better timing specially if you have a tuner so i dunno
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #15  
casper3380's Avatar
casper3380
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

iv used 87 and lower at times in the past, but 89 from here on out, do exceptions. Mine does better on 89, she seems to run happier, as for which 87 being faster, gotta be in your head m8, sorry.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #16  
dunerider650's Avatar
dunerider650
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

There IS a difference in fuels - aside from the octane rating

Different fuel blends burn at different rates under the same temperatures and pressures. Absolute fact.

Peak cylinder pressure, for best power output, MUST be timed to occur just after the top of the stroke.

To tune for maximum power, you would like to use a fuel that burns at the quickest possible rate - without "knock" (there - that covers pre-ignition and detonation) so you can initiate burning at the latest possible time and still produce peak cylinder pressure at around TDC. That way, the rising cylinder pressure pushes back down on the top of the rising piston for the shortest period of time - decreasing power lost there.
A more specific location for peak cylinder pressure would be ~15 degrees after TDC. There is some variance from that figure - but not more than a degree or so in an engine using gasoline. When the ignition timing is correct, power output will be highest for that rpm and throttle position.
(thanks, Al Cline!)

Octane?
If you look at the octane rating as only an indicator of what the fuel was designed for, you'd guess that a 120 octane fuel was probably designed for an engine that was prone to "knock" - like an older American V8 with relatively poor cooling and high compression. That fuel will be blended to burn at controllable rate that matches the high pressures and temperatures present AND resist "knock". A good match for those V8 engine conditions.

Burn Rates- That's the ticket!!
If you take that same fuel that worked well in the above V8, and run it in an engine, like a cbr900, with it's lower cranking compression and lower combustion chamber temps, it will, without a doubt, burn much too slowly at those lower temps and pressures and reach maximum cylinder pressure too far after TDC for best power.
Things generally burn slower when they are cooler and vice versa. Peak cylinder pressure will occur much past TDC - decreasing the power produced if you keep the same ignition timing.
You can advance ignition timing to try to recover power, but that will cause the air/fuel mixture to burn earlier in the crank stroke and spend, percentage wise, more of the energy produced by the expanding, burning mixture, pushing back down, trying to prevent the piston from rising up to the power stroke - robbing power.
If you MUST use a slow burning fuel, which USUALLY has a high octane rating, advancing the ignition timing will lessen the power loss, but the best results are usually obtained with the quickest burning fuel obtainable, that, of course, doesn't "knock".

All other factors being the same, except for burn rate - use the quickest burning fuel that doesn't "knock", light the spark in the middle of the combustion chamber, adjust ignition timing to reach peak cylinder pressure ~TDC and keep your mixture correct. When the ignition timing is correct, the engine will make best power for that fuel.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #17  
dunerider650's Avatar
dunerider650
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

just a little info i stole off the net
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:43 PM
  #18  
SMKNRAM's Avatar
SMKNRAM
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 2
From: Sylva, NC
Default

hey redone, of course it is faster when clean it is more slick and just cuts through the air!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #19  
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1
Site Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,657
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

A fresh wax job will make it even faster/slicker.

A different brand of fuel with no ethanol in it may make it run better, That stuff is crap!!
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.