3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Tunners set on economy.

Old Jan 17, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #1  
cyclone429's Avatar
cyclone429
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 2
From: Alberta
Default Tunners set on economy.

My truck has become a pig snorting gas hogging fart smelling dog.

I will be changing out the plugs, cleaning out the tbi and all the small mainatance stuff.

My question, How soon do you recover the cost of the tunner when your setting is not on a performance tune but economy tune?

I can buy a lot of flue for 300.00+ bucks and my driving habbits are not NASCAR inspired.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #2  
Pyro's Avatar
Pyro
I Beat Tetris
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
Default

You running a Superchips? I get better mileage on performance tune than the economy tune. Enough to offset the cost of 93 vs 89.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #3  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Ain't no mod will recoup it's cost in fuel savings in any realistic amount of time except for maybe an efan. A lot of great reasons to buy a tuner, but solely for mpg gains ain't one of 'em. I don't care what tune you install...
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #4  
BEAR's Avatar
BEAR
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: REDNECK, USA
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
Ain't no mod will recoup it's cost in fuel savings in any realistic amount of time except for maybe an efan. A lot of great reasons to buy a tuner, but solely for mpg gains ain't one of 'em. I don't care what tune you install...
Very true, but as Flame boy said, the 91 tune will give you better mileage if you drive it sensibly. Nothing says, just because you install the 91 Performance tune, you have to drive it like you stole it. I very seldom do any more(WOT) but I like to know its there if I want to.
 

Last edited by BEAR; Jan 17, 2010 at 03:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 04:13 PM
  #5  
cyclone429's Avatar
cyclone429
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 2
From: Alberta
Default

Thank you!!

My truck is not what I would say is a performance machine, the 6sp manual is geared for tourque and the 373 lt slip gives me ok highway mpg and the hemi has lots of power, in a nut shell I own a work truck thats stuck with city drving..

I have true daul ex and now finding with age and miles driven, my truck aint what it used to be with mileage, I know the plugs and basic maintance items are due and I want to get back, or get better milage numbers to when My truck was new.

86,000 Km to date, plugs have been changed once, diff fluids, transfer case, engine oil changed, all ways run mid grage ( ya winter gas is here ) 60 psi in the tires, air filter is new.

My trucks used to avarge 20 MPG highway, now I'm on the high 12 mpg numbers with higway/city combined.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
Shiloh 24's Avatar
Shiloh 24
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
From: El Dorado, Kansas
Default

I agree with the tuner not exactly payin for itself as most mods don't. I can't say anything though especially because if I put the performance tune on mine with a superchips I would drive even more Nascar inspired than what I do already. Also your mpg losses aren't just because of vehicle age. It's been discussed before that the newer gas has the E10 (10% ethanol I believe) which gives less mileage because it doesn't burn as efficiently.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 06:35 PM
  #7  
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 1
Default

I am seeing the same results as Pyro, better MPG's with the performance tune over the 87 tune.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 06:42 PM
  #8  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Yeah, I tested this extensively right after I got my SC. I mean right down to the cost per gallon of gas figured into the equation to come up with a cost per mile driven. Even with the economy tune and using .30 cents per gallon cheaper 87 octane, the cost per mile was still better with the performance tune and 93 octane gas. Was fairly close as I remember, within about 2 cents per mile driven. But you factor the performance tunes inherent benefits over the economy tune also, and it ain't even close. Run the Performance Tune every time, unless you plan to tow...
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 07:03 PM
  #9  
bwhite757's Avatar
bwhite757
All Star
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 942
Likes: 1
From: SC
Default

With my Edge, set to economy I seen an improvement in MPG, and the truck did run much better than when using 87 octane on a stock tune.

Performance tune and 93 octane netted me a slightly better MPG, but definitely not enough to compensate for the extra .35-.55 on the gallon.

When I had the Superchips, I didn't see any improvement with economy tune, just the fact that the truck performed better with the 87 octane than it did with stock tune.

Performance tune with Superchips and 93 octane seen an increase of maybe 2 MPG's, but with my figures, you were still losing $$ using 93 over 87...

All of my local gas stations charge anywhere from $0.35 - $0.55 more for 93 octane..

So a rough estimate:

93 octane Gas @ $2.75 x 25 gallons = $68.75
87 octane Gas @ $2.40 x 25 gallons = $60

17 MPG's x 25 gallons = 425 miles / $68.75 = $0.17 per mile
15 MPG's x 25 gallons = 375 miles / $60 = $0.16 per mile

Again, that's just with the Superchips, my Edge Evolution gave me about a 1 - 1.5 MPG gain with economy & 87 vs Stock & 89
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.