3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Huh. So, it *is* "Heavy Duty"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #11  
Bigc9164's Avatar
Bigc9164
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

i have had almost 1900 pounds in the back of my 1500 reg cab short bed with the 4.7 and it handled it NO problem...there was a bit of sag! but with my e rated nitto terras it was completely fine!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #12  
Rojhan's Avatar
Rojhan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

"After":







You can click on each pic for slightly larger versions.

I'll get the before pics up... after...
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 07:34 PM
  #13  
shortburb's Avatar
shortburb
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Denver CO
Default

When I first got my truck (1500 4wd 5.7) I got the bed topped off (level with the top of the bed) with 2 inch rocks for a landscaping project I was working on.

Suspension bottomed out, tires near flat (with 50psi in them)...it was a slow ride home. The motor and trans carried it well. The suspension did not.

I have a pic somewhere Ill see if I can dig it up.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #14  
OICUDRIVE12's Avatar
OICUDRIVE12
Professional
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

By ratings on the side of the truck 1500,2500,3500
(1/2),(3/4),(1/1)- Ton

I thought these were the weight ratings of what the "Pay Load" is on the particular truck.

2000 pounds in the bed is alot of weight, but even my 1500 will carry it but its not the taking off or hauling its the stopping and steering that suffers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #15  
Rojhan's Avatar
Rojhan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OICUDRIVE12
By ratings on the side of the truck 1500,2500,3500
(1/2),(3/4),(1/1)- Ton

I thought these were the weight ratings of what the "Pay Load" is on the particular truck.

2000 pounds in the bed is alot of weight, but even my 1500 will carry it but its not the taking off or hauling its the stopping and steering that suffers.
1500,2500,3500 and 1/2,3/4,1-ton used to be more closely related, but as consumer demands have grown and manufacturing has advanced, they are... more like guidelines. My "3/4-ton 2500" has a rated payload of 2,700 pounds. Not quite double "3/4-ton".

The increasing numbers still represent an increase in capacity, but you have to actually check specs now.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #16  
Rojhan's Avatar
Rojhan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Measuring from center of axle to top of wheel well.

Empty: 40-1/2" front, 40" rear.
Full: 41-1/4" front, 38-1/2" rear.

The front did come up a little bit, but it was till nose-down overall.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #17  
OICUDRIVE12's Avatar
OICUDRIVE12
Professional
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Rojhan
1500,2500,3500 and 1/2,3/4,1-ton used to be more closely related, but as consumer demands have grown and manufacturing has advanced, they are... more like guidelines. My "3/4-ton 2500" has a rated payload of 2,700 pounds. Not quite double "3/4-ton".

The increasing numbers still represent an increase in capacity, but you have to actually check specs now.

Thnx for the info. Thats why I'm here to learn small stuff like that.

Alone we are just 1 but together we are many. LMAO.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #18  
RedTruck-VA's Avatar
RedTruck-VA
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 1
From: La Union, Philippines
Default

Very impressive, those are real trucks....
I didn't think you could actually put stuff in the bed.. well I do put a case of oil and a filter or two at times in there.
I guess thats why I have mine covered up.,,,,
Seriously, I occassional pull an enclose 12' motorcycle trailer. But that is as much work she ever gets.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 01:12 AM
  #19  
gasguy's Avatar
gasguy
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown, Tx
Default

nice lookin' truck!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #20  
Rojhan's Avatar
Rojhan
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

FWIW - braking was noticeably different (not in the least "bad" or "scary", just different). Handling was the same. The ride was a bit smoother with the rear spring compressed.

Gasguy - not bad for stock
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.