3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Buying a Ram: Have Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #11  
AF_HEMI's Avatar
AF_HEMI
Champion
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
From: Minot AFB, ND in person, the 'burgh at heart
Default

The autos in the 4.7 are the same as the 5.7. They all use the 5-45RFE. Typically, the people that have tranny problems are those that try to shove a lot of power through it (like me -- except fortunately i havent had tranny issues yet, knock no wood). They may be really inefficient, but the autos will hold together the life of the truck as long as you dont abuse it.

Im not familiar with the manual's reliability, but the fact that i havent heard of any issues probably speaks for itself.
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2010 | 09:23 AM
  #12  
jroy's Avatar
jroy
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by AF_HEMI
I call BS on a RC 4.7 beating a tricked out QC cummins.
Eh, I beat my buddy's built 12 valve Cummins RCLB with my truck. Though I think I got him on the shifts as his is manual, I could hear him chirping the tires all the way through third but he had good traction.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 05:54 AM
  #13  
RawRam2006's Avatar
RawRam2006
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 467
Likes: 1
From: Burleson, TX
Default

From a dig, yes, Cummins all the way, top end......4.7L all day long. I know, "i seent it". Lol.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #14  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

The 545rfe is significantly better than the 45rfe transmission as far as longevity goes. Still about the least efficient auto on the market though as far as parasitic loss, but they do last a lot longer than older Chrysler trannies.
You CAN NOT get anything other than a CTD in a manual transmission any more. NO 4.7, no Hemi whether it's 1500 or 2500.

IMPO get the Hemi, especially if you are looking QC or 4x4 or both. Even though there is nothing wrong with the 4.7 and it's a very underrated engine, IMO, but there is almost no mpg advantage to the 4.7...
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 07:57 AM
  #15  
Gone Fishin's Avatar
Gone Fishin
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, IN
Default

If you want to go to a stick----I did, You'll have to move up to a 2500 if you want the Hemi.

I like the combination, and have no need for the Cummins, especially the 10k increase in price when I bought mine. The six speed comes out of the Mercedes-Bentz commercial truck line and is *******ly bullet proof. I still have the original clutch in mine at 130K, but most of my mileage is highway too.

Hope this helps in your decision
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #16  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Fishin
If you want to go to a stick----I did, You'll have to move up to a 2500 if you want the Hemi.
You'd have to move up to an OLDER 2500 as they are not produced with a manual transmission any more...
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:41 AM
  #17  
hoss67's Avatar
hoss67
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
You'd have to move up to an OLDER 2500 as they are not produced with a manual transmission any more...
Sadly hammer is correct, kinda lame if u ask me, manual is the only way to go for me, so looks like the cummins is my next truck, i drove my buddies hemi before i decided on this truck and his was a RCSB and yes it had more power, i just kinda felt bored driving it ya know and dont have much faith in autos... but thats my opinion...
 

Last edited by hoss67; May 22, 2010 at 09:50 AM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 11:10 AM
  #18  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
You'd have to move up to an OLDER 2500 as they are not produced with a manual transmission any more...
I'm looking for older ones anyway, I can't afford a new truck.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #19  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
QC or 4x4 or both. Even though there is nothing wrong with the 4.7 and it's a very underrated engine, IMO, but there is almost no mpg advantage to the 4.7...
I will have to do some more looking. There is a decent looking 2003 with the 4.7 4x4 QC here, and i'm hoping I can get it for cheap. MPG is not really important to me, but it may be if it's unbearable.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #20  
hoss67's Avatar
hoss67
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by MadisonDakota
I will have to do some more looking. There is a decent looking 2003 with the 4.7 4x4 QC here, and i'm hoping I can get it for cheap. MPG is not really important to me, but it may be if it's unbearable.
I have 34s on my truck and i get around 12.5 city and about 15-16 highway, mine is a 6-speed and that extra 6th gear really help with MPG on the highway, i go 70 and it only runs at 2100 rpms, i dont know about the autos though...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 PM.