WHY NO MDS ON 2500 HEMI ??
Anyone know why the MDS system isn't available on the HEMI for the 2500? I bought an '06 2500 and am only getting about 11 mpg, & would love to have the MDS. If the MDS is as good as Dodge says it is, why not offer it on the whole Hemi lineup?
My 2500 has over 24k now, and I'm getting 15-16 mpg 60% highway, 40 city. If you drive it like you stole it, I guarantee you'll get substantially reduced MPG. After the first 5k, the mileage starts getting better. Make sure you keep the oil and filter changed at the minimum intervals, if not sooner. The cylinder walls are getting properly polished for the better compression.
Personally, I'm glad they left the MDS off. I feel that this option is one more mechanical problem that will in time rear its ugly head. I would rather D/M make them e-85 compatible first. The technology is there, they just don't want to invest the money. [:@]
Personally, I'm glad they left the MDS off. I feel that this option is one more mechanical problem that will in time rear its ugly head. I would rather D/M make them e-85 compatible first. The technology is there, they just don't want to invest the money. [:@]
I'm also a little concerned about MDS and how it will hold up. Course I'm no rocket scientist (or A Dodge engieer) Ha ha. Seems like GMC (Caddy) also had MDS a few years ago and it went by the way side for some reason.
Trending Topics
The mechanical implementation of MDS on the 5.7L Hemi is not complicated at all. It is a very slight modification to the lifters on four of the cylinders.
It was implemented on the 300C, Magnum, and Durango before it was brought to the Ram and Charger, and I have yet to hear of any issues with it yet. If anything, I think the big issue is how effective it is for the driving style of most people, not how durable it is mechanically speaking. The only problem might be from people using the wrong oil from what is recommended.
It was implemented on the 300C, Magnum, and Durango before it was brought to the Ram and Charger, and I have yet to hear of any issues with it yet. If anything, I think the big issue is how effective it is for the driving style of most people, not how durable it is mechanically speaking. The only problem might be from people using the wrong oil from what is recommended.
The MDS is designed for light duty vehicles. As soon as Dodge put a independent front end on the 1500 Ram, it became a light duty truck, ie. no snowplow, etc... The 2500/3500 Heavy Duty is a different animal. From the frame, axles, suspention, on up, all its parts are made bigger and tougher for commercial applications and heavy duty work. Dodge has no intention on putting a MDS in the big trucks from what I have heard.
I am no fan of diesels so I was glad to hear they left the MDS off of the 2500/3500 Hemi.
When you buy a 2500/3500 Ram, your intentions and priorities are very clear on what you expect your pickup truck to do. Big, Powerfull, Toughness, etc.... MPG is last on that list. If it makes you feel better, your MPG will get better after 5k or so.
Its a badge of honner and goes along with buying the biggest and badest of trucks. In a way, I am kind of glad, because it keeps the SUV/soccer moms away from the pick-up world.
I am no fan of diesels so I was glad to hear they left the MDS off of the 2500/3500 Hemi.
When you buy a 2500/3500 Ram, your intentions and priorities are very clear on what you expect your pickup truck to do. Big, Powerfull, Toughness, etc.... MPG is last on that list. If it makes you feel better, your MPG will get better after 5k or so.
Its a badge of honner and goes along with buying the biggest and badest of trucks. In a way, I am kind of glad, because it keeps the SUV/soccer moms away from the pick-up world.
ORIGINAL: Gone Fishin
My 2500 has over 24k now, and I'm getting 15-16 mpg 60% highway, 40 city. If you drive it like you stole it, I guarantee you'll get substantially reduced MPG. After the first 5k, the mileage starts getting better. Make sure you keep the oil and filter changed at the minimum intervals, if not sooner. The cylinder walls are getting properly polished for the better compression.
Personally, I'm glad they left the MDS off. I feel that this option is one more mechanical problem that will in time rear its ugly head. I would rather D/M make them e-85 compatible first. The technology is there, they just don't want to invest the money. [:@]
My 2500 has over 24k now, and I'm getting 15-16 mpg 60% highway, 40 city. If you drive it like you stole it, I guarantee you'll get substantially reduced MPG. After the first 5k, the mileage starts getting better. Make sure you keep the oil and filter changed at the minimum intervals, if not sooner. The cylinder walls are getting properly polished for the better compression.
Personally, I'm glad they left the MDS off. I feel that this option is one more mechanical problem that will in time rear its ugly head. I would rather D/M make them e-85 compatible first. The technology is there, they just don't want to invest the money. [:@]



