3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Just lifting the front 2wd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #21  
TXST8tj's Avatar
TXST8tj
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: Just lifting the front 2wd

it's really no matter, they aren't going to go anywhere. the A arms do not allow for the spring to come close to popping out, so neither will the spacer. $80 for those daystar spacers is a decent deal though.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 01:53 AM
  #22  
perfectlytuned's Avatar
perfectlytuned
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default RE: Just lifting the front 2wd

ORIGINAL: TXST8tj

yeah, i think you're right about the spindle and shocks. i've been out of the IFS world for some time now....since my blazer.
however, an alignment is always needed anytime you mess with the front end components..suspension, steering or otherwise. it's just a smart thing to do, and it's really not a big deal to get done.

not sure how a body lift is stupid. it may not have the appearance everyone likes, but that comes down to the individual. and it's hardly unsafe. you've probably seen trucks that have been in an accident and the bed or cab has shifted on the BL pucks. if they where hit hard enough for that to happen, and they had an equal height suspension lift instead, it's likely they would've been flopped over on their side since their COG was so much higher. guess i'd rather have a shifted bed than a truck on its side. personally, i'd rather get an extra inch or two or clearance from a body lift and keep my center of gravity down, rather than get that same inch of clearance from a suspension lift, raising my center of gravity more than from a BL, and still having the same amount of room to fit a certain size tire. trust me, on a 2wd truck, unless it's being built to prerun in baja, you are not going to get any performance out of a lift kit....you get the opposite. the kits on the market today will make the ride of a 2wd truck horrible. they are designed for looks, not performance....regardless of what Fabcrap would like to tell you. i generally don't care for the look of a 3" body lift, but for a 2wd truck, there is no better way to gain clearance. it's about clearance for the biggest tire possible which is where you get your ground clearance, and a body lift allows you to do that without making your suspension stupid high. the body lift debate has gone on for years, and it's not going to end anytime soon. people that like them and what they offer, run them. those that don't like them, think they are "stupid". to each their own.
the spacers are desgined as a "leveling kit". pure an simple.......only to level the truck front to back. it's not an issue of performance, it's about the truck looking level. don't see where that is stupid either.
i guess i can understand the whole COG thing with a body lift but lifting ur body off ur chassis doesnt make it right. think ur engine will be 3 inches lower than it is stock?!? these cars are engineered to be the way they are, why change it in the first place? So ur saying that getting a suspension lift such as Fabtech is for looks??? even though u change the ****ty suspension with a newer spring, control arm, spindle, shocks etc??? and the blocks that come with a cheap body lift are better??? If anyone were to pick a 3 inch lift for there dodge 10 out of 10 would choose the suspension lift over the blocks, guarenteed! the debate comes with what truck u buy as well, the dodge 2wd has literally maybe 5 variations to do with a "lift." if u look for lifts for a jeep its incredible how many they have. i never said that coil spacers would "pop" out, the angle of the A arms with a large spacer are so dramatic that so much stress is put on the ball joints that it is easy for one to pop off even coming out of a steep driveway. I even called Daystar and the man said if it was me i wouldnt put them on. why not look for some fender flares for larger tires? why do u even want the largest tires possible, ull just suck more gas, ull have to set the speedometer,the V6 will be workin harder, and the noise that some tires make will drive u crazy.?.
i dont get where u get ur info, but what ever thats the truth
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 03:11 PM
  #23  
TXST8tj's Avatar
TXST8tj
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: Just lifting the front 2wd

but lifting ur body off ur chassis doesnt make it right
and what makes it wrong? the rubber isolators on the body mount already lift it from the frame. what's your point?

think ur engine will be 3 inches lower than it is stock?!?
umm, a body lift lifts the body...it doesn't lower anything. the engine will not move from it's stock location.

So ur saying that getting a suspension lift such as Fabtech is for looks???
exactly. fabtech has horrible quality control and makes a poor quality product. the ride after one of their coil lifts would be terrible. unless you step up to a full out custom racing designed system (which isn't even practical), the 2wd kits on the market today are not worth the headache. go jump your truck with a fabtech lift on it and then tell me you gained performance when the front end crumbles.

i never said that coil spacers would "pop" out, the angle of the A arms with a large spacer are so dramatic that so much stress is put on the ball joints that it is easy for one to pop off even coming out of a steep driveway.
my comment about the spacer staying in place was in response to eltupac's mention of bolt-in spacers.

why not look for some fender flares for larger tires?
a fender flare is not going to make any more room for a bigger tire.

why do u even want the largest tires possible?
isn't that the point of lifting a vehicle?.....to fit a larger tire. you get ground clearance from tire size. the bigger the tire, the more ground clearance. you gain nothing by lifting a truck 4" or whatever and retaining a factory height tire.

i dont get where u get ur info, but what ever thats the truth
from experience young grasshopper.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #24  
perfectlytuned's Avatar
perfectlytuned
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default RE: Just lifting the front 2wd

ORIGINAL: TXST8tj

but lifting ur body off ur chassis doesnt make it right
and what makes it wrong? the rubber isolators on the body mount already lift it from the frame. what's your point?[/quote]

the rubber isolators do lift it but ur pretty much saying that if i bore out a motorcycle engine maybe from 250cc to 450cc it wont effect the clutch, size of radiator, amount of oil etc will it? everythin will have a larger strain and parts will wear quicker as u romp it.

think ur engine will be 3 inches lower than it is stock?!?
[/quote]umm, a body lift lifts the body...it doesn't lower anything. the engine will not move from it's stock location.[/quote]
what i meant to say was that u will riding in ur cab 3 inches higher than what it was stock or in other words the engine will be 3 inches lower than how it was.

So ur saying that getting a suspension lift such as Fabtech is for looks???
[/quote]exactly. fabtech has horrible quality control and makes a poor quality product. the ride after one of their coil lifts would be terrible. unless you step up to a full out custom racing designed system (which isn't even practical), the 2wd kits on the market today are not worth the headache. go jump your truck with a fabtech lift on it and then tell me you gained performance when the front end crumbles. [/quote]

thats why u have to know ur limits. i would never jump my truck unless i spent 20 grand on suspension. lifting any vehicle will make handleing slightly crapier and think about it fabtech is a widely known off road performance dealer who has tested there products. so maybe the idea of coilover suspension isnt the greatest but some like em.

i never said that coil spacers would "pop" out, the angle of the A arms with a large spacer are so dramatic that so much stress is put on the ball joints that it is easy for one to pop off even coming out of a steep driveway.
my comment about the spacer staying in place was in response to eltupac's mention of bolt-in spacers.

why not look for some fender flares for larger tires?
[/quote]a fender flare is not going to make any more room for a bigger tire.[/quote]

ur right

why do u even want the largest tires possible?
[/quote]isn't that the point of lifting a vehicle?.....to fit a larger tire. you get ground clearance from tire size. the bigger the tire, the more ground clearance. you gain nothing by lifting a truck 4" or whatever and retaining a factory height tire.[/quote]

wat good are larger tires if u have crappy axle articulation as well as wheelhop and driveline bind because of the increased leverage on the axle? u want clearance for larger obstacles correct? how do u expect to get over them safely with the stock suspension?


[/quote]
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:27 PM
  #25  
TXST8tj's Avatar
TXST8tj
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: Just lifting the front 2wd

the rubber isolators do lift it but ur pretty much saying that if i bore out a motorcycle engine maybe from 250cc to 450cc it wont effect the clutch, size of radiator, amount of oil etc will it? everythin will have a larger strain and parts will wear quicker as u romp it.
yeah, pretty sure boring out an engine and body mounts are completely different things....hard to make a case using such unlike things. a body lift does not add any extra weight and does not create any more downward force on the body mounts than they already have. where is the extra strain coming from again? as i've mentioned, i'm not apersonalfanof large body lifts, but forastheticsreasons, not reasons leading to poor performance or function.

what i meant to say was that u will riding in ur cab 3 inches higher than what it was stock or in other words the engine will be 3 inches lower than how it was.
i know what you meant by the cab being higher, but the engine is not moving in relation to you because of the body lift. you move in relation to the engine because of the body lift. the engine remains low, keeping the center of gravity down, while the body is 3" higher creating lift/clearance. that's a much better situation to be in than the entire truck being 3" higher.

thats why u have to know ur limits. i would never jump my truck unless i spent 20 grand on suspension. lifting any vehicle will make handleing slightly crapier and think about it fabtech is a widely known off road performance dealer who has tested there products. so maybe the idea of coilover suspension isnt the greatest but some like em.
"widely known" doesn't mean good. saying fabtech makes a good product in the offroad world is like saying sony makes a good product in the electronics world. a coilover system is a fine idea if it's built properly, but no one was talking about that.

wat good are larger tires if u have crappy axle articulation as well as wheelhop and driveline bind because of the increased leverage on the axle? u want clearance for larger obstacles correct? how do u expect to get over them safely with the stock suspension?
your IFS truck does not have a front axle. larger tires do not create wheel hop or driveline bind. no one mentioned using a stock suspension and larger tires. after looking back, i actually mentioned using a lift to fit a larger tire. it's all about doing it correctly though.
lift your truck 4". put a 33" tire under there. you have raised your center of gravity to a certain degree. you have the room to get over harder obstacles, but you are less stable. put a 4" lift on your truck and find a way toFIT a 35" tire under there (which includes proper room for useful articulation) and you have raised your truck's ground clearance, and at the same time lowered your center of gravity for running that same size tire and made your truck more stable for that size lift, versus running a larger lift to fit that tire. it's simple physics man. i didn't need my college degrees to figure that out.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #26  
roadney's Avatar
roadney
Professional
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Default

I installed the 2.5" spacer and left the coil spring isolator in. I gained around 4" of lift. I added 2" blocks in the back and the front is still slightly higher maybe 1/4"or less. I have driven it for over a year with no major problems. If I hit a large bump the upper control arm will hit the frame. Haven't been able to find a fix for this yet. I will eventually take out the isolater and that should take away at least 1/2" of lift.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #27  
derricksmash's Avatar
derricksmash
V6 Ram Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

pictures...
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #28  
heritagecon's Avatar
heritagecon
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: four oaks, nc
Default

how much do you know about 87 d150 2wd
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #29  
Mxrichy366's Avatar
Mxrichy366
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

I wanna get some metal coil spacers but i can't find them anywhere for the 2002 2wd 1500 because i heard the poly spacers like wear out after awhile is it true that they wear out?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 03:39 AM
  #30  
derricksmash's Avatar
derricksmash
V6 Ram Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

might need to venture over to the general 3rd gen ram section....cause literally several dozens and doenz os ram drivers are rocking the front-end spacers...and it seems like a pieace of cake from what i near. ask hammerz71...he's the offroad guy i think, and knows his stuff.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.