3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Comp Cams Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:34 PM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Comp Cams Comparison

I found this info while searching around the net for cam specs for my upcoming cam install. Thought that some of you might find this info interesting if you are looking at some hard numbers about different cams, I know I sure did. Interesting to see that the 260, 268 and 273 are all pretty comparable until you get above 5500 rpm. The four pulls were done on an engine dyno with the only other mod being a set of LT’s.

 
  #2  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:37 PM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here are some graphs to make it easier to compare the four cams.


 
  #3  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:40 PM
SilverBullet08's Avatar
SilverBullet08
SilverBullet08 is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 6,556
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

nice info. i was looking at the 260...
 
  #4  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:43 PM
RubberFrog's Avatar
RubberFrog
RubberFrog is offline
Champion
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It really makes it clear that the 260 is the best choice for a daily driver.
 
  #5  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:58 PM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RubberFrog
It really makes it clear that the 260 is the best choice for a daily driver.
That is what I thought too. Unless you are really racing your truck you are not going to see any benefit from going with the 268 or 273. That is why I am going with a grind off of the comp 260.
 
  #6  
Old 11-28-2009, 12:59 PM
kicker417's Avatar
kicker417
kicker417 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so a 260 would be good for a daily driver
 
  #7  
Old 11-28-2009, 01:06 PM
moosefire66's Avatar
moosefire66
moosefire66 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 260 actually seems to be the best IMO. It makes more TQ than the 273, and more HP than the 273 up until 5,000rpm's. I mean, how many times do we really go above 5,000rpm's ? I am really liking the numbers on the 260 a lot. When you do a cam swap, is there anything else involved with it? such as lifters, springs, etc???
 
  #8  
Old 11-28-2009, 01:08 PM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kicker417
so a 260 would be good for a daily driver
Yes. Check out the torque curve in the 260, that is what you need to get your heavy qc 4x4 moving. That is one of the reasons I am going with a 260ish grind.
 
  #9  
Old 11-28-2009, 02:16 PM
05RamMan's Avatar
05RamMan
05RamMan is offline
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would love to see a dynosheet of someone with a comp 260 and 4.56's.
 
  #10  
Old 11-28-2009, 02:44 PM
cheapbeater's Avatar
cheapbeater
cheapbeater is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

great info teach! i'm waiting till more of you guys do the install so i have someone to direct my questions to.. then maybe, just maybe
 


Quick Reply: Comp Cams Comparison



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM.