4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

26.13 mpg!!!!

Old Oct 22, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
oldjeep's Avatar
oldjeep
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,497
Likes: 1
From: MN
Default

Could you describe how you are calculating your milage. Even 24 doesn't seem possible with a Hemi.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #12  
ivaskaj's Avatar
ivaskaj
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

The speed limit kept changing from 55, 60, 70 due to road work, so I just kept it at 55 in the right lane the whole way. Not much traffic on the road at all, people just came flying up and passed me up without slowing down a bit. I divide miles driven by gallons to fill it up.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #13  
rolltidehemi's Avatar
rolltidehemi
Captain
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: cooper city, florida
Default

Shun the non-believers!!!!!!!


Get rid of the e10 crap, it does nothing but make the oil companies richer with tax exemptions with the costs being the same = higher profits, less mpgs. Not to mention screwing up every combustion engine that sits idle for over a week at a time (boats, mowers, trimmers, etc.).
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #14  
Islander_212's Avatar
Islander_212
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Danville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by deeko2007
APPARENTLEY YOU DON'T FARM!!!! ETHANOL KICKS GAS!!!... or are you from saudi arabia?
We still have to buy the same amount of oil with the blended Ethanol since the mileage is so much worse. We're just throwing away the corn gas! 10% ethanol with 10% less fuel economy... I am not the sharpest tool in the shed but that is a wash!
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #15  
oldjeep's Avatar
oldjeep
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,497
Likes: 1
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by rolltidehemi
Shun the non-believers!!!!!!!


Get rid of the e10 crap, it does nothing but make the oil companies richer with tax exemptions with the costs being the same = higher profits, less mpgs. Not to mention screwing up every combustion engine that sits idle for over a week at a time (boats, mowers, trimmers, etc.).

Lower milage yes
Increases food costs yes
As far as the sitting in the tank - that's BS. It's only a problem when you have run on real gas for a long time and then switch, since it tends to clean out all the gunk. I store my boat, snowmobiles, lawnmower, trimmer and 2 cars for months at a time with E10 and they all start right up.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #16  
ran jr's Avatar
ran jr
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Islander_212
We still have to buy the same amount of oil with the blended Ethanol since the mileage is so much worse. We're just throwing away the corn gas! 10% ethanol with 10% less fuel economy... I am not the sharpest tool in the shed but that is a wash!
Bingo!! The consumer gains nothing here. This hurts us because we are also seeing the cost from food and grain to be impacted. Sure the farmers benifit, why wouldn't they.

I really think it's a bad idea anytime we start using food or water to fuel our vehicles. I'm still a firm believer that the best fuel is Bio Diesel. I mean this is a waste product blended in with diesel that doesn't negatively effect the performance. Think about it, these fast food joints used to pay to have it hauled off, now they sell it. There's no other use for it, corn on the other hand......
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #17  
AL68's Avatar
AL68
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ran jr
I'm writing my Congressman right now to see if they'll ban driving a steady 55mph on the interstate. Please tell me the Posted Speed Limit wasn't 70. If it was, I hope you had your hazard lights on the entire time. It's hard enough to get people to slow down to 70, think of how fast their coming up on you at 25-30 mph faster than you.

And before anyone gets upset, if the posted limit was 55 or 60 then I appoligize if my post case across negative. I'm just going off the fact that the average posted Interstate Speed Limit across the country is 70.
70 is the limit, meaning your not suppose to go over that number but you can drive slower if you wish, most states have a minimum posted of like 55, I wouldn't advise driving this slow but if you must keep to the far right hand lane.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #18  
ran jr's Avatar
ran jr
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by AL68
70 is the limit, meaning your not suppose to go over that number but you can drive slower if you wish, most states have a minimum posted of like 55, I wouldn't advise driving this slow but if you must keep to the far right hand lane.
Thanks, I'm well aware of the relulations. You have to remember that the minimum speed limit was implemented for those vehicles that could not safely travel at the posted "limit". Point being, anytime you purposely drive 15 mph in either direction of the "limit" it's dangerous. 15 under is also know as impeading the flow of traffic and the cause of many accidents, not to mention traffic jams. It's just careless and irresponsible for someone driving a vehicle fully capable of mantaining the posted speed to drive 15 under for no other reason than to squeeze every bit of fuel ecconomy out of their 390 HP pickup truck. He saved 6 bucks and took an hour longer to drive at that speed. I don't know about the rest of you but my time is worth 7 times that an hour.
 

Last edited by ran jr; Oct 22, 2009 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #19  
72combo's Avatar
72combo
Champion
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

E85 Ethanol is available at Meijers. now I am told that is like 94 octane and my kids little Avenger 2.7 L v6 is gonna run that ?
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #20  
72combo's Avatar
72combo
Champion
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by ran jr
Thanks, I'm well aware of the relulations. You have to remember that the minimum speed limit was implemented for those vehicles that could not safely travel at the posted "limit". Point being, anytime you purposely drive 15 mph in either direction of the "limit" it's dangerous. 15 under is also know as impeading the flow of traffic and the cause of many accidents, not to mention traffic jams. It's just careless and irresponsible for someone driving a vehicle fully capable of mantaining the posted speed to drive 15 under for no other reason than to squeeze every bit of fuel ecconomy out of their 390 HP pickup truck. He saved 6 bucks and took an hour longer to drive at that speed. I don't know about the rest of you but my time is worth 7 times that an hour.
I would like to see some of the roads increase to like even 75 or 80....where it's all straight flat road. Here in ONtario Canada the 401 highway used to be 70 when I was a kid so most drove 80 or more, no seat belts, babies in the front seat, dad probably drunk driving home from Christmas out of town. I do remember seeing a lot more accidents as well as people stuck in the snow. Lots of changes, but 70 mph is a good speed limit for freeways. You are driving 50 mph in a lot of city roads...in Canada we are lucky to drive 40mph on a 3 lane road.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.