4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

87 Octane vs 89 Octane..

Old Aug 3, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #11  
oldjeep's Avatar
oldjeep
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,497
Likes: 1
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
I could give a rat's a$$ what the manual says I know that in EVERY case I've seen a failed compression test or a dropped piston in a modern Hemi, the owner either admitted to running 87 octane on the spot or 'fessed up to it later.
09 Ram - Lifetime powertrain warranty - I'll stick with what the manual says Also the hemi in my 09 is quite a bit different than the one in your 04.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 06:29 PM
  #12  
05Dakotaho's Avatar
05Dakotaho
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

I made 2 test runs while towing a 4200lb travel trailer in hill country.

200 miles with 89


200 miles with 87


Dogged it pretty hard to check for detonation which as I recall from the 60's thru 80's sounded like "pinging" or "clattering".


Didn't hear nuthin but that darn truck is so quiet inside I coulda missed it.


Summary: I use 87 all the time except for towing when I use 89 to be on the safe side and 93 ONLY when I have a Superchips tune installed.


p.s. Speaking of quiet cab; I took my truck into the dealer for 6,000 mile service and a couple of nit picky warranty items. To my surprise, my "additional/extended" bumper to bumper warranty provided for a FREE rental vehicle.

The rental car company picked me up at the dealership and chauffered me to the rental lot in a brand new Cadillac Escalade and that beast was noisy, noisy, noisy inside...road noise and drivetrain noise.

Then the rental car I got was a Dodge Nitro. Comfy car but horribly noisy.


Sure will be glad to get the Ram back tomorrow.
 

Last edited by 05Dakotaho; Aug 3, 2010 at 06:39 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #13  
LVRR's Avatar
LVRR
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
I could give a rat's a$$ what the manual says I know that in EVERY case I've seen a failed compression test or a dropped piston in a modern Hemi, the owner either admitted to running 87 octane on the spot or 'fessed up to it later. And unless you are hooked up and monitoring for it, there is NO WAY of knowing if there is a pre-detonation happening unless it's severe if you are hearing a knock, you are causing irreversible engine damage.

Run you your 87 octane fuel every tank full, odds are you'll never have an issue, but nothing you can say or show in a manual will have me believe that the CHANCES of a major engine problem is not increased. I've seen what pre-detonation does with my own eyes... Going down a one way street at 90 mph doesn't mean you'll have a head on either, but I like my chances better if I was heading the right way. LOL...

Personally, I think it's VERY irresponsible of Chrysler to even put that in the manual. They are in essence leaving the burden of being able to tell if there is sufficient ping or knock or pre-detonation on the owner of the vehicle! If you design an engine that performs at peak efficiency at 89, then either state that 87 octane is NOT to be used OR design the thing with stereo knock sensors and a tune that will pull timing when necessary!!!
Most of the times I have seen failed compression tests usually happened because the fuel air mixture was to lean and burned the valve seats. Lean settings will make the combustion chamber run hotter and burn off oil around the rings and cylinder walls causing ring wear. 87 vs 89 octane is not a big difference especially with variable cam timing. These engines are not that high a compression ratio to make a big difference either. Not like the days of old when we ran 101 octane with 13 to 1 and higher compression. Normal everyday driving should be fine with 87, but if you are towing and under load or tend to mash the pedal a lot I would then recommend 89, then it makes more sense. Use whatever floats you boat. You would hear pre-detonation in your engine, tends to be very distinct.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #14  
pdavis53's Avatar
pdavis53
All Star
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, NH
Default

I run 89 in my truck because the Manual recomends it and my company pays for my fuel. My wife uses 87 in her Jeep with the Hemi because she doesn't care. I have had no issues with either, my truck does get bett mpg's but I doubt it is because of the fuel grade.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #15  
milestone's Avatar
milestone
Rookie
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Other that cost, would 94 octane have any benefits over 89?

Is there a difference between 89 octane gas vs 90 octane ethanol blend gas?
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 10:19 PM
  #16  
LVRR's Avatar
LVRR
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by milestone
Other that cost, would 94 octane have any benefits over 89?

Is there a difference between 89 octane gas vs 90 octane ethanol blend gas?

Running any higher than 89 is a waste of money, unless you run a tune on your truck and set it out side the factory parameters. The difference would be 1 octane and a dilution of fuel with ethanol, which usually means a little less mpg and fewer corn on the cob at the dinner table.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 12:09 AM
  #17  
2009reghemi's Avatar
2009reghemi
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

I notice a mpg gain with 89 over 87, that's all. Since I drive highway alot I always use 89
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 01:37 AM
  #18  
dodgeran's Avatar
dodgeran
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

I have an 03 hemi ram 4x4...210,000 km (100000km=62000 miles) 87 octane from day one and still running strong...just bought a '10 hemi laramie last week...it will get the 87 octane as well....and the 03 will now be a huntin truck and will still drink 87...no mechanic here..just experience with my truck..
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 06:17 AM
  #19  
frogslinger's Avatar
frogslinger
Captain
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Dyess, TX
Default

Originally Posted by LVRR
Running any higher than 89 is a waste of money, unless you run a tune on your truck and set it out side the factory parameters. The difference would be 1 octane and a dilution of fuel with ethanol, which usually means a little less mpg and fewer corn on the cob at the dinner table.
Unless you are towing or a speedster even 89 is a waste. All that running 87 does is slightly lower HP output.

90 octane will drive just like 89 and you will get about 4% worse gas mileage (if you believe the math. E10 has 96.6% of the energy of regular gas).

Ethanol has no affect on the corn on the cob supply. Ethanol comes from feeder corn so will affect the price of meat much more quickly than table corn. Obviously everything in an economy interconnects so there maybe ripples in unexpected directions.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 11:48 AM
  #20  
Pedro Dog's Avatar
Pedro Dog
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 5
From: San Pedro, California
Default

Originally Posted by frogslinger
Unless you are towing or a speedster even 89 is a waste. All that running 87 does is slightly lower HP output.
I agree 100%, the difference is for anti pinging, the energy content is the same. With the 89, the engine timing is more advanced - thus more HP. I think I get better milage with the 87 - as a matter of fact, I got great milage on 85 while up in the high country in Utah and Colorado.

Recommended
does not equal required, so if you run 87 and you have engine problems, it was not the gas.

I know some of the other members "know from the school of hard knocks", but today's technology is much better at managing the engine so the 87 is not a problem.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.