Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

Was Chrysler really the problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Thread Starter
|
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default Was Chrysler really the problem?

How smart is this? DCX lost €3.9 billion on Smart over four years


DaimlerChrysler stock has soared ever since news hit the street that a Chrysler sale was imminent. After all, Chrysler lost $1.5 billion in the 3rd quarter of 2006, and the Germans were convinced that the Pentastar was the root of all their problems. Now comes word from German newspaper Handelsblatt that DCX dropped a cool €3.9 billion on the Smart brand in only four years, which puts the microcar brand in Jaguar-bad territory. Since DCX doesn't break out profits or losses for Smart, Automotive News reports that Handelsblatt came up with the figure after obtaining the information from liquidated Smart GmbH in Böblingen, Germany. How could such a small, cute little vehicle cause so much financial heartache for the brilliant German luxury automaker? We don't know, but it'll be interesting to see if DCX shareholders react to this news like they did Chrysler's losses. We'd also like to know whether Daimler sought any advice or help from value brand Chrysler on how to produce a vehicle inexpensively, but somehow we doubt it.

[Source: Automotive News (subscription req'd)][/align]
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #2  
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Dak attack!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1
From: Turn down the heat please
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

Not so Smart after all
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 06:15 AM
  #3  
grungerockjeeper's Avatar
grungerockjeeper
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

"How could such a small, cute little vehicle cause so much financial heartache for the brilliant German luxury automaker? "

Because no one here in america wants ugly, slow, useless deathtraps like that!!!! Several dealerships here in Portland are infested with those things, and have been since I got here 9 months ago. Any guesses on how many Ive seen out and about on the roads in this time?
.
.
.
.
.
.
2!!!!! Thats right. Only 2 of these that Ive seen actually on the road. Gee whiz, I wonder why? Prolly because anyone who has $12K to drop on something tiny that gets 60 mpg has already figured out that $8K will buy a spankin new motorcycle thats a hell of a lot more fun to ride and will stand up about as well in a collision...
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 04:58 AM
  #4  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

The only reason you've only seen 2 of them is because they are not available in the US yet, they are in Europe and Canada and very few have been brought here from one of those places. The Smart will become available here in the US in early 2008.

Like the whole DCX merger, Dumler used Chrysler by taking Chryslers money and putting it into Dumler Benz. Dumler improved Chryslers luxary and fit and finish, but they also used them as an excuse for their own declining sales even though they see-sawed back and forth. Dumler used Chrysler much like a vampire would used a random victim, they sucked the life and money out of them and left them for dead.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:19 AM
  #5  
Maui_808's Avatar
Maui_808
Rookie
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

I have never seen one
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #6  
grungerockjeeper's Avatar
grungerockjeeper
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

ORIGINAL: 71RoadRunner

The only reason you've only seen 2 of them is because they are not available in the US yet, they are in Europe and Canada and very few have been brought here from one of those places. The Smart will become available here in the US in early 2008.

Like the whole DCX merger, Dumler used Chrysler by taking Chryslers money and putting it into Dumler Benz. Dumler improved Chryslers luxary and fit and finish, but they also used them as an excuse for their own declining sales even though they see-sawed back and forth. Dumler used Chrysler much like a vampire would used a random victim, they sucked the life and money out of them and left them for dead.
No way. Re-read my post. They've had those things warming the lots ever since I moved here 9 months ago. Maybe longer.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
dustyloins's Avatar
dustyloins
R.I.P. Dusty (Retired Moderator
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,471
Likes: 0
From: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

You'd need a death wish to drive one of those things around here..........

Dusty
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #8  
Kensai's Avatar
Kensai
Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 4
From: Dallas, Tx
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

I think those things would be great for urban intowndriving, but I would not use this too much for long trip use.
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #9  
deranged's Avatar
deranged
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 1
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

The real question should be who cares at this point. Chrysler has a fresh start and will be able to stand on it's own merits. Daimler used Chrysler for better domestic (U.S.) identificationwith it's (Mercedes) brand not Chrysler's. Now they can eat crow as Chrysler continues to grow as long as they keep introducing exciting and innovative product.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #10  
Exubus's Avatar
Exubus
Champion
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
Default RE: Was Chrysler really the problem?

I saw one of those Smart cars around here outside of a business... the thing was half the size of my Neon.

Unlike Ford or GM, DCX restructured the Chrysler supplier chains way back in the summer of 2001, in anticipation that money would get tight, and they wanted their suppliers to be competitive so they didn't lose money down the road (like how GM and Ford did).

I also remember a couple years back reading about DCX admitting that the Chrysler products were doing well, and the oversees Mercedes sales were down over 45%, which attributed to the loss of overall profit for DCX. I wish I could find that article again...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.