Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

uh-oh for Chrysler!

Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #11  
92oilburner's Avatar
92oilburner
Professional
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: MotorCity
Default

I also think our vehicles are too heavy, But there is a reason. Chrysler prides itself on the amount of products that meet the Gov's "5 STAR" crash ratings. That adds weight! How many other car co.'s advertise "5 star" crash ratings? What I can't believe is that new little Mustang weighs 4000 lbs.?
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #12  
kevin mccune's Avatar
kevin mccune
Amateur
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Well Chrysler needs to get a bit more efficient,excess dead weight is a drag-I remember when Ford used to brag that the "Pinto had more ground hugging weight then the imports"-Kevin
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:26 PM
  #13  
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Dak attack!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1
From: Turn down the heat please
Default

Originally Posted by kevin mccune
Well Chrysler needs to get a bit more efficient,excess dead weight is a drag-I remember when Ford used to brag that the "Pinto had more ground hugging weight then the imports"-Kevin
They also could have said the Pinto had more "explosive power"

Safety definitely plays a role in the weight, the government wants cars with 'X' efficiency but they also have to meet 'X' requirements over here and 'X requirements over there some of which are actually counter-productive to each other (for example the more heavy safety equipment is added to the vehicle the harder it will be to make it efficient). Another example is pedestrian impact standards, bumper has to be a certain height, have certain characteristics, this obviously limits some of what can be done with aero...

Personally I think some basic safety regulations are a good thing but our government has taken regulations in general way overboard when it comes to the automotive industry. They're sitting on top of an industry they've tied down with regulations going "come on, get up and run, what's wrong with you?".
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 08:28 PM
  #14  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default

Man, this thread is behind the times.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #15  
InfernoRedHemi's Avatar
InfernoRedHemi
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Northeastern Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 92oilburner
I also think our vehicles are too heavy, But there is a reason. Chrysler prides itself on the amount of products that meet the Gov's "5 STAR" crash ratings. That adds weight! How many other car co.'s advertise "5 star" crash ratings? What I can't believe is that new little Mustang weighs 4000 lbs.?
Isn't safety the most important thing when it comes to vehicles? Because if you died in an accidence you won't be around to brag about the great gas mileage your getting.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #16  
InfernoRedHemi's Avatar
InfernoRedHemi
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Northeastern Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Redone4x4
I agree with Hammer...to a certain extent. They make some of the hottest cars on the market, also. Ones like the Challenger, only chrysler has been able to combine classic and modern that well in a "car". and in my opinion, with the 300C, magnum, charger and challenger, they have the most stylish cars also. maybe get rid of some stuff that might not be selling as much, like the caliber? i dont know, i might catch grief for that one but thats my thoughts on it. Yes, the jeep market has always been strong. the truck market kinda took off in 94 and is still going strong if you ask me. If i go to a dodge dealer around here, most of them seem to cater to the truck market. They have one of every truck with every option there for you to leave with...
Yeh Chrysler does have some sick cars that I wish I could have.

Originally Posted by gidy34
Keep the van, but go to one rather than having a dodge and chrysler. Keep the Trucks, Keep certain jeep vehicles, Wrangler, Grand Cherokee. Bring back the Cherokee. Dump the following: Avenger, Caliber, Journey, Viper, Nitro, 300, sebring, pt cruiser, aspen, compass, patriot, liberty, commander.
Viper no. But the other cars are just filler cars. I agree.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:15 AM
  #17  
dodgerules86's Avatar
dodgerules86
Champion
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 5
From: Sycamore, Illinois (displaced to Arkansas)
Default

First, Chrysler needs to get rid of some vehicles.

Second, just because a vehicle is heavy does not mean its safer. And, like wise, just because a vehicle is more lightweight does not mean its less safe. It's all about where the reinforcements are (where the weight is at). This is what engineers are paid for.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #18  
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
The Forum Tyrant
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 27,728
Likes: 3
From: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Default

there are plenty of vehicles in the world that meet safety standards without weighing 4500lbs.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #19  
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1
Site Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,657
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

Most new cars are pigs. The Mustang is too heavy. I feel perfectly safe in my 88 5.0 LX that only weighs 3180lbs. They now weigh in at almost 1000lbs more!!!
As for Dodges that don't sell? I seen ton's of Ram trucks around here as well a lot of Calibers, Avengers and Grand Caravans. I also see many Durangos and Chrysler Pacificas.
We have two Ford plants here in town, but Dodge sells pretty well here as well.
For reasons that I do not understand, there seem to be a lot of Caliber bashers out there. It is a cool little car that works well for a 6'2" guy like myself. Plenty of up front leg room and sits up high enough that I can enter and exit fairly easy. They get pretty good gas mileage as well. Hell the wife drives 7 miles each way to work in stop and go traffic after letting it warm up on reformulated fuel and it still gets 20mpg. On the highway, it gets over 30 mpg with a 2.0/CVT-II . True, it's no Neon, but still a good car.

I don't know why Chrysler couldn't retool a plant with the existing Neon tooling and start producing them again. They sold well and with some minor updates, would sell again.

If I could afford to, I would help out and buy an 09 Ram. But it is not in the budget since I bought 3 new Dodges last year. I don't think that I can get a 09 Ram comparable to my 08 for the same $289 a month
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:42 PM
  #20  
Nofrag's Avatar
Nofrag
Champion
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Default

To tell you the truth, I don't recall ever seeing a Pacifica off the lot. I don't have anything bad to say about the Caliber, but I've never driven one. It does look a little too much like an Aztec though.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.