Anyone else see the similarities between the back end of the caliber and the back end of this very unpopular vehicle?



[IMG]local://upfiles/8943/6DF6F4FF9F054438910575C13256F44A.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/8943/D300C91DD2C44231A711C8D19BF41416.jpg[/IMG]



Don't get me wrong I'm all for the Caliber I just thought it was interesting that they chose to design the rear after the ugliest peice of crap to ever hit the streets.[sm=bs.gif]

 

Not really. The backend of the Caliber has a lot less drastic angle, different curves/lines, and much different lights as well as the black accented overhang, so no I dont see it, and is not much different from a lot of other hatchbacks. To say the Aztek is ugly just because of the back would only be describing 5% of its overall ugliness.

 

Simply put... No, there are zero similarities, besides the fact that they both have hatches...[&:]

 

[sm=noooo.gif] Nope, don't see any!

 

No similarities....

 

Bleh, whatever. They're very similar to me. They're the most similar out of any other SUV/Hatchback on the market and everyone knows it.

 

that caliber isn't an SUV

 

I agree Nick, neither one of them are, but they are both in the same class. Mmm I wonder if that is why some think they look the same. It is kinda like saying that all pick-ups look the same cause their in the same class.

 

Unfortunately 2004sxt ... they are right ...

This quote comes from a press release on www.dodge.com. No SUV here If you haven't already, check out the press release, it has some interesting facts, you might find useful!

Kelly S

 

I honestly don't see any thing that is alike.. How do they even compare? Only that are both a hatchback.